Message from @Revolutionaryarmchair
Discord ID: 536902834998738944
And I’ve said this many times, FASCISM IS RIGHT AND LEFT lol, there isn’t one side
Well, not so quite, but it theoretically could be.
No
It is
Sources?
Stalin was a fascist, hitler was a fascist, Mussolini was a fascist, even fucking mao was a fascist
it is ain't gonna cut it, scholars debate this type of stuff all the time (regarding facism)
I don’t give a flying fuck what scolars debate, I literally could care less for what they say
Stalin=fascism, I agree sort of but you are seriously lacking in the full ideology of socialism in one country
Woah
What fascism is isn't consistent through its use either, in Germany you had war time and peace time economy
We've got someone with a "free" mind
@Ano , love your point
It focus is on power, not so much economic distrubtion.
Oh and something you’ll learn here, is no one asks for definitions, or could you be more specific often. You know why, because people who debate here know they’re argument inside and out so yeah, you are slowing down progress
I would disagree
Israel is politically fascist, they protect their border, limit their minority populations, aggressively expand in to West bank, practice eugenics by sterilizing black jews. Economically I think they are socialist but idk
Oh please enlighten me, I’ve seen it first hand for month what could you give me to prove me wrong
If you mean libertarianism as how most americans think of it, then you would have a hard time understanding what I mean by libertarian socialism
Ok first off Ano we gonna have a debate right fucking now to the government
A neo-marxist is a person who adheres to neo-marxism. Neo-marxism is an offshoot of marxism, in which it is believed that all societal ills come from the divide between the rich (who are claimed to be undeserving of their wealth) and the poor (who are claimed to be oppressed). Marxists believe that all personal failings are of a direct result of someone else oppressing you, and that another person cannot be successful without oppressing another.
Neo-marxism differs from marxism by abandoning the dichotomy of rich vs poor and instead adopt identity politics. Instead of the dichotomy being between wealthy and poor, it is between successful and unsuccessful demographics. Neo-marxists divide all demographics (white, black, asian, male, female, gay, straight, etc) and place them in a hierarchy of oppression as determined by how successful that demographic is. White and Asian men are at the bottom of this hierarchy, whereas blacks and females are near the top (although the exact order is not widely accepted).
Neo-marxists believe that successful demographics are only successful because they exploit the less successful demographics, and as such believe that the more successful demographics (i.e the 'rich' of classical marxism) should be punished in some way, and what they have should be given to the less successful demographics. Typically this involves giving these demographics money, positions, and political influence simply for being a member of a "oppressed" demographic.
Neo-marxist: "White men are evil and oppressive! We need to remove them from society!"
Oh fuck
---> idenity politics sorry for wall of text
Just curious, where did you get that from?
Is this fucking clear enough lol
On neo-marxism, yeah sure
At least of what I know
This practically sums up what I know about neo-marxism
yes but this is 80% of the left movement today
But the weimar republic, read a little more about it please.
Don’t you fucking say it revo
Don’t you fucking say it
@crank, maybe,
Oh nice one
lmao
Lol
what did you say?
Dyton said I was spaming