education also does not seem to be the answer, civil war disrupts the learning process to much

colonialism worked for a bit, but every people has a right to rule themselves (even though they where way better off on paper, just less free)

then again, china is going full economic colonialism, though i fear the afrikans wont fare that well under chinas rule..

you know, considering what communist tend to do when they have too many people and not enough resources

not trying to crap on the idea, but is that even a good thing?

what is?

economic colonialism?

specifically, to raise the average IQ of an entire race

IQ is like a gun, its as good as the goal you chose for it

that's precisely why I ask

good news though, the evidence suggest that not being selfish and spreading the love is better for everyone in the longrun

smarties get to become rich, not smarties get to enjoy your mass produces genius

im more worried about genetic manipulation having unforseen long term consequences

as knowing everything a series of genes does is near impossible

like..

lets say you imprint smarty genes on africans

cant do all of em, impossible task

so some get smarter then others

smart people tend to breed with each other more then with dumber people, on average

will this create expression of regressed genes in the new african elite?

good news for that though is that troughout the ages smart peeps tend to have enough resources to pass off more offspring, known as the multi generational wealth distribution effect

i dono, its very complex, which is why we need more data, maybe about blue hats, too see where we can meddle with things without pulling the rug from out under the entire stack of cards

and part of the reason we dont get data on this specificly, is because race and IQ is soo touchy

we are not allowed to know what we need to know to fix the problem

free game: https://store.steampowered.com/sale/oddworld/

race and IQ isnt touchy, if you stand by facts, the facts will speak for themselves,

If you believe all races have the same average IQ, you shouldn't be afraid of getting it tested to put it into factual evidence, and if you turn out to be wrong and there IS difference, then the matter is closed too. That said, why would a difference in IQ change how you treat other races? we don't treat the dummies in society any different now either

you tailor solutions to the person you talk too, that is obvious

i dont think they will have the same average IQ - I think it will be different and different times .. because its made up of random people

if you are trying to solve a problem for a avg iq of 80 country, you gotta know how simple you need to make it

sample size are inormous wacka

it doesnt matter how big the sample size is

keep in mind, the US miletary does not accept recruits under 80IQ, because they cant do anything with them, even during war. its in their law

i couldn't distinguish between a 100 iq person and an 80 iq one, since i consider 95% of the population to be subject to idiocy

how big brained of you

so even if the sample size is 7 billion people, theoretically, it would not be representative wacka?

it would still be meaningless . yes

you understand what a science is?

i dont think you understand what "average" means

it doesnt matter because you still cant determine its based on race

sure you can

to create theories that make better then chance predictions about society