gotta protect em though, which is where selection for smarter humans comes in

that still leaves that first human to suck on a cows tit, however....

lmao

people wherent that dumb back then

they saw the similarities, baby cow drinks from udder mommy cow

baby human drink from bobs mommy human

maybe we can drink from cow udder too?

i understand the joke and all, but if you tackle it seriously its not that hard to see i think

anyway

off to bed gn

have fun dreamin about death robots that can now run

this isn't really that new

''Why is the media trying to malign so many individuals who challenge the mainstream narrative?''

The reason probably speaks for itself lol

you protect your power by discrediting the enemy!

So by discrediting themselves?

Because it's what they do with their actions

Then again, they are their own worst enemy

Ye, they are setting themselves up for termination. But their strategy is all about attributing negative connotations to their opponents.

they want to give certain names a stigma by attaching labels of racism or alt-right on it, or whatever else works. So when people hear the name ''Sargon of Akkad'' people will think: ''wasnt he racist or sumthin?'' folks will naturally be weary and mistrusting of him, even WHEN they read his wikipedia page or see his youtube channel. so even if the mainstream media dies, they will make sure people like Sargon will be too stigmatized to definitely replace them

Thats MY take on it anyway

But then they label everyone these things, so that there is an increase chance of someone knowing the a person personally who the msn has now labeled racist or alt right or whatever. And they realize the term is bs

its a mix of things,

They need the audience to stay alive, so they keep up the extreme fear and terror level of reporting (Trump did this, Trump did that, ooh how terrible!)

And at the same time try to prevent people from knowing they're full of shit, by smearing them, and having the people stay afraid by basically going "Oooh, so many evil nazi people, <MSM> is correct, we're all in danger! what else can they tell me?"

Ye

so those people are afraid, and trust their media source, and if their media source tells them to avoid people like sargon, the people will be afraid of sargon and listen to anything anti-him because he's supposedly bad

Also grenade not as many people realize the term is BS because the term is very open to interpretation and has actually switched meaning over the years lol

What is considered racist today wasnt racist 20 years ago

well, its mainly that not many people are interested enough, they lead their own lives, and just catch some media to stay just updated enough

Its easy to find anything racist and it's all evil because we live in an evil society

what is considered racist today was called being liberal 20 years ago

and being radical 60 years ago

Fucking cunts. Are (((they))) trying to make the war worse? https://www.timesofisrael.com/liberman-warns-iran-if-you-give-us-rain-you-will-get-a-flood/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/operation-house-of-cards-the-iaf-mission-to-destroy-irans-presence-in-syria/

is it Israel and any other middle east country? then yes.

@Deleted User cool it with the anti-semitic remarks

Nine out of ten times I would agree with you WHAT, but he may have a point this time.

The statement of not wanting to escalate the conflict does not work to well when you just performed the biggest assault in the last 50 years in retaliation to an attack that had no casualties.

i wonder if you could just be a crepidarian https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/994804291817918469?s=20

Hi everone. Im from Sweden

sorry to hear that

hello isaac

maybe you could help me with something