You need to post the other two, Twitter is not a traditional public forum.

The twitter thing is complete nonsense

Twitter has traditionally been censorious.

someone got salty af that Trump blocked them

thats all there is to it

^ ^ ^

Pretty much.

They were making money off of their promotion from countertweeting trump

Bess Kalb, All the way down.

I doubt it was so much “salt” as much as they saw it personally advantageous for their Brand

As an aspiring twitter journo

@RyeNorth i am not talking about twitter atm, but to your point that Trump is not representative of the government or wield government power at all time. I'm asking when does his actions cross the line from private citizen to government official?

Twitter is id; expect nonsense

and yes, its clear someone was salty

There is @POTUS and then there is Trump's personal twitter accoutn

I mean the line of him not being government seemed liek a personal opinion. He is always government until he leaves office.

When he executes government-issued power.

When he signs a bill into law

when he drafts and signs an executive order

it takes neither of these to block someone on twitter

Twitter blocking is a privilege to all

okay, so he can block people from entering an open public form, so long as its done with his own private resources, not the government/

You're basing this around the argument that his twitter is an open public forum.

You have yet to establish this, other than pointing at an activist ruling.

Twitter is not a public forum

twitter is a private company

twitter can delete Trump account, or block ppl on his behalf

@Ivanfr this ruling doesn't do anything to change that. it only dictates what the government can do, not twitter

they can do anything they want

Donald Trump's twitter is not the government.

This is your statement, and i am asking at what point does his private actions cross a line and become government actions because of their nature or intent

Twitter can sell the company to China

xD

Your argument HINGES on proving that Twitter is an open public forum.

and your counter argument hinges on trump not always being president while in office

so, can trump order a private security firm, with his own money, to block people from going to a public forum.

not necessarily twitter

just any open public forum

You just conceded that my argument DOESN'T hinge on that.

Besides

Question: Does free speech require being able to tie your speech as a response to the tweet you are tweeting about in this case?