Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 449609631082479638


2018-05-25 16:19:32 UTC  

yup

2018-05-25 16:19:38 UTC  

can be

2018-05-25 16:19:42 UTC  

or a mistrial

2018-05-25 16:20:22 UTC  

there was probably some legalities too if I had to imagine.. poor jurors

2018-05-25 16:21:00 UTC  

anyway, here, it would be jury sequester, not infringing on press rights...

2018-05-25 16:21:04 UTC  

they dont really sequester much anymore - its incredibly expensive.. they have to pay each juror not to mention all the people hired...

2018-05-25 16:21:06 UTC  

regardless of why the gag order was placed, it was placed (and gag orders happen here too)

2018-05-25 16:21:28 UTC  

there were rooms at the courthouse for that.. but appaarently its very rare

2018-05-25 16:21:35 UTC  

yeah it's rare

2018-05-25 16:21:40 UTC  

my case only lasted 3 days

2018-05-25 16:22:01 UTC  

each day it was like .. one hour then the judge is like, ok lets have a break everyone

2018-05-25 16:22:03 UTC  

usualy only high profile trials obviously

2018-05-25 16:23:42 UTC  

well, point being, its there. and if it covered the whole trail, not just parts, then technically they were not wrong to arrest him. not on legal grounds. And if he knew that, and since he knew this session was over, just waiting on the verdict, then they are also correct to say he was disturbing the peace.

2018-05-25 16:23:46 UTC  

again, "breachign the peace" is trumped up charge

2018-05-25 16:24:05 UTC  

meh we can disagree here

2018-05-25 16:24:45 UTC  

but he did say in his stream "harass this man, harass his family, etc"

2018-05-25 16:26:09 UTC  

is it? like i said, if he knew it was breaking the law and then tried to frame it as he had no idea and they were arresting him for nothing, also said that, then those are all intentionally provocative statements.

2018-05-25 16:27:01 UTC  

yup and setenced for 13 months in prison

2018-05-25 16:27:09 UTC  

in which he will probably not survive.

2018-05-25 16:27:48 UTC  

well, technically its because he did it again despite being told not to

2018-05-25 16:28:09 UTC  

now if you want to talk about the original sentencing, that might be BS, i can't tell you

2018-05-25 16:28:45 UTC  

also, have the actually sentenced him on that? or was that the threat and now they need to affirm the actual length of the sentence

2018-05-25 16:28:50 UTC  
2018-05-25 16:29:35 UTC  

you started that one to quick

2018-05-25 16:29:55 UTC  

for context

2018-05-25 16:30:07 UTC  

he was saying the media was harrassing the generation identity guy, and he said if you're going to harass someone, harass these guys on trial

2018-05-25 16:30:19 UTC  

he didn't straight up call for harrassment

2018-05-25 16:31:00 UTC  

technically he did. i agree its slightly bs to call that technicality, but its there

2018-05-25 16:31:04 UTC  

well.. he did straight up call for harassment ...thats just the reason for it

2018-05-25 16:31:08 UTC  

Holy cow

2018-05-25 16:31:14 UTC  

The Robinson stuff

2018-05-25 16:31:35 UTC  

although i really want to see the gag ruling

2018-05-25 16:31:44 UTC  

whether that reason is justified or not is another question

2018-05-25 16:31:45 UTC  

also

2018-05-25 16:31:49 UTC  

hes talking to the media

2018-05-25 16:31:49 UTC  

if it specifies the first part of the trail only, then this is a lot of bs

2018-05-25 16:32:00 UTC  

media harrassing is different then normal harassing

2018-05-25 16:32:26 UTC  

yeah, hes talking to the media

2018-05-25 16:32:37 UTC  

not an outward requst for normal people to harrass

2018-05-25 16:32:44 UTC  

isntead of hte other person he was talking about

2018-05-25 16:33:13 UTC  

Im not syaing its right, I'm just saying that it's not as cut as try as him telling the general populace to start harrassing people