well, technically its because he did it again despite being told not to

now if you want to talk about the original sentencing, that might be BS, i can't tell you

also, have the actually sentenced him on that? or was that the threat and now they need to affirm the actual length of the sentence

here: https://youtu.be/dC_33CJZ7W8?t=12m10s

you started that one to quick

for context

he was saying the media was harrassing the generation identity guy, and he said if you're going to harass someone, harass these guys on trial

he didn't straight up call for harrassment

technically he did. i agree its slightly bs to call that technicality, but its there

well.. he did straight up call for harassment ...thats just the reason for it

Holy cow

The Robinson stuff

although i really want to see the gag ruling

whether that reason is justified or not is another question

also

hes talking to the media

if it specifies the first part of the trail only, then this is a lot of bs

media harrassing is different then normal harassing

yeah, hes talking to the media

not an outward requst for normal people to harrass

isntead of hte other person he was talking about

Im not syaing its right, I'm just saying that it's not as cut as try as him telling the general populace to start harrassing people

as he's talking TO the media

he said the media harassed generation identity, but doesn't specify anyone when saying "if you are gonna harass someone"

but that statement is grounds for arrest, and whether the charge holds up if for the courts to decide

which they decided context doesn't matter in the UK

so

hes talking to the media there yo

I dont know if thats why the police got involved... I just posed it as a posibility

i agree, but that is an interpretation and up for the courts to decide. Since he didn't say "if the media is gonna harass someone." just if someone is gonna harass someone.

the police got involved because its tommy

and he exists

lmao

there will be no court involvement here

he will go directly to jail

he's already been convicted

^

also, context doesn't matter

and now will serve his suspended sentance

i.e. count dankula

so there is no court to decide if he actually violated parole?

nope