Message from @Ivanfr

Discord ID: 450692167778959361


2018-05-28 16:07:05 UTC  

Enforcing that law in that case is ilegitimate

2018-05-28 16:07:25 UTC  

because 1: There was no reason why the public should not know that the grooming happened

2018-05-28 16:07:34 UTC  

and 2: I dont think Tommy was informed of this

2018-05-28 16:07:39 UTC  

hes saying he doesnt care because he will be in protective custody the whole time

2018-05-28 16:07:55 UTC  

"you could be put into protective custody"

2018-05-28 16:08:00 UTC  

What’s the difference between all the journalists outside the court when count dankula was being tried and the grooming gang case?

2018-05-28 16:08:03 UTC  

not that he would

2018-05-28 16:08:24 UTC  

I'd understand a gag law being enforced in a critical matter

2018-05-28 16:08:35 UTC  

like an inminent terrorist attack or something

2018-05-28 16:08:40 UTC  

I think the blackout was that there were so many defendants that they couldn't try them all at once and didn't want the outcome of the first trial affecting the second one

2018-05-28 16:08:54 UTC  

hence the blackout

2018-05-28 16:09:04 UTC  

but still, how would TR know he couldn't do what he did

2018-05-28 16:09:09 UTC  

he was media

2018-05-28 16:09:14 UTC  

he was covering an event

2018-05-28 16:09:18 UTC  

and he got arrested

2018-05-28 16:09:25 UTC  

prior record/shit be damned

2018-05-28 16:09:29 UTC  

If he had been informed he wouldnt be in jail

2018-05-28 16:09:30 UTC  

he knew, because thats what he was arrested for in the first place

2018-05-28 16:09:35 UTC  

right

2018-05-28 16:09:37 UTC  

I get that

2018-05-28 16:09:46 UTC  

I dont think he knew

2018-05-28 16:09:52 UTC  

he is not stupid

2018-05-28 16:10:00 UTC  

if he knew he wouldnt have reported on it

2018-05-28 16:10:07 UTC  

and I concede he probably did break whatever shit law / command / whatever, but it's still wrong

2018-05-28 16:10:12 UTC  

maybe the first time... but not the second

2018-05-28 16:10:37 UTC  

He didnt look like he had any idea that the law was in place for that case

2018-05-28 16:10:40 UTC  

I get what you're saying wacka, but he's done a ton of shit that he could have since been arrested for if that's true

2018-05-28 16:11:00 UTC  

its kinda like YT, you don't know what would cause you to be arrested...

2018-05-28 16:11:20 UTC  

he hasnt done the thing that he was expressly told not to do since he was arrested for the same thing tthough

2018-05-28 16:11:21 UTC  

He and his lawyer know exactly what he can do and say without getting arrested

2018-05-28 16:11:24 UTC  

I do agree, as Sargon said, it was a poor choice

2018-05-28 16:11:53 UTC  

mmhm I think there is something Im missing

2018-05-28 16:12:05 UTC  

He knew he would be arrested?

2018-05-28 16:12:12 UTC  

I don't think he did

2018-05-28 16:12:32 UTC  

hes already been arrested for the exact same thing... I dont think he would just forget that

2018-05-28 16:12:39 UTC  

but he probably knew it *could* get him arrested, not that he would have

2018-05-28 16:12:46 UTC  

calculated risk that ended poorly I guess

2018-05-28 16:12:53 UTC  

anyway

2018-05-28 16:13:08 UTC  

again, we're discussing the semantics of a shitty law

2018-05-28 16:13:12 UTC  

whatever law that is

2018-05-28 16:13:29 UTC  

contempt of court