<:heresy:591248412800712706>

<:peepok:583236153852035072>

rump is my lord and savior

Hail rump

He is going to win the election though

Probably, and you don't have to be a trump supporter to see that. The DNC has almost as much money on hand as they are in debt while the top has raised almost 400 million dollars, honestly how is this man going to lose?

<:peepohype:583660763135344645> 🇺🇸

Depends how much the DNC will sabotage itself. They might hate someone like Bernie Sanders more than Trump.

Well you see what's happened to tulsi gabbard so far

Gotta love that NBC coverage too

They deliberately credited Pete with words be never said at the debate

She's probably one of the most moderate candidate, moderate positions being what most voters want (like myself), but the DNC and radical left has continuously sabotaged her, and this in conjunction with her own shortcomings as a candidate which has greatly diminished her chances of becoming president. Andrew Yang, Corey Booker, Pete Buttigieg, and Kamala Harris probably won't have a realistic chance either. And you also have the "Bernie or Bust" folks who will probably flip to support trump if Bernie doesn't make it, which would leave Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden as the only real contenders left. Biden however is falling apart in debates, so the nominee will probably go to Warren, who is essentially Hillary Clinton with a Bernie mask (who also isn't as forthcoming about the mechanics of her wealth tax than Bernie is). And all of this, compounded with the hundreds of millions of dollars wide gap between the DNC and GOP's fundraising can only end in disaster. I mean I expected the DNC to not exactly shore up it's finest candidates, but holy fucking shit this is bad.

Perhaps they got someone else doing a Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the media Outlets as well.

Coverage on politics in general is pretty horrid, so i'm not exactly surprised

And the ignorance of the American Collective is pretty piss-poor as well

Trump is largely a symptom of the people. And the corruption that's been allowed to build and stay ignored for decades

I need to amend one thing. The ignorance of America is at an all-time high during these modern times.

Sort of, the election of Trump was more of the people giving a giant middle finger to the Democratic Establishment. Which is likely why the democrats are trying so badly to get him removed from office at all costs and why the republicans are rallying around him

There is a divide among the Republican voters for Trump, but the establishment at DC will pretty much bend over backwards for him.

GG @Mid Endian, you just advanced to level 4!

And if the GOP can control the message well enough, the fall in line and vote for Trump anyway. That's something the Republicans have usually been good about, controlling the narrative

There is a divide there but it isn't much, nothing comparable to the rift between moderate democrats and the progressive democrats and radical leftists

🆙 | **Cobra Commander leveled up!**

What do you mean by the Republicans "controlling the narrative?" I don't quite follow.

I'm not saying the don't necessarily, I'm simply curious.

Fox News, AM radio, staying on message as if every Republican pundit, congressman, conservative Corporation, has a talking points memo beamed directly into their heads.

They tend to stay United on the messaging, which makes it's more believable to their voting public.

Well that's something certainly not exclusive to the Republicans, the Democrats do the same thing.

More infighting among the Democrats though

And I'm just referring to leadership.

Well, what counts for leadership at any rate

Sure but there are messages also repeated there across the board

Ok well now I'm a bit confused, what exactly do you consider as constituting the leadership per se?

Are you referring to the members of the party itself or just general figureheads across the political wing?

Both. Those in the media who resent the messaging they want the voters to hear, and the congressman and senators.

Oh so media types along with politicians, I see.

Of course the corporate donors own establishment for both parties

Trump is both useful and dangerous to The Establishment at the same time.

Bernie represents everything anti-establishment, so in some ways he's a bigger threat

Idk, I agree but I find the narrative problem to be far more egregious on the left these days.

Not really, he's kind of bought into the whole PC stuff wholesale this time around. I feel like this might actually improve his chances in this election as opposed to 2016