is this monetized/restricted? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25ZBUtItCYE

No ads but plays fine

imagine nearly 14m views and no monetisation 😦

I just tried a few times just now... might have been monetized before.

I'm getting ads what you guys on about

nice.. I was wondering if it got ads... since its about "making guns"

ummm I hope the new narrative is not going to be how great China's censorship is... https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23831800-400-censored-why-chinas-online-oversight-is-anything-but-crude/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=SOC&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1528067021

I just got a survey on it

Definitely ads on that video, got 2 in a row

so

with the ruling on twitter

can I just tweet anything to any publicly elected official in the states

and if they block me

it's illegal

?

technically

but no one is going to enforce anything anyway

bummer

I cant tweet at all, since Twitter "thinks" I'm a bot just because I follow conservatives

even tho I confirmed my phone number and email twice

https://discord.gg/UDJZn5z @everyone

shoo

@Ivanfr should call up twitter and be like "do i sound like a bot to you?"

although you would probably get a robo-answering system #irony

Twitter is ran by SJWs

naw, its run by cowards with no spines

None of the data they have about my account looks like a bot

why ban the follower? just ban the conservative

because my account is small

if they ban the conservative they will have to be honest about it

if they ban me they just do it behind the scenes

and never admit it

see? people without a spine, folding to people who beat up random people on the street and call themselves good.

I just did a test and in fact I'm shadowbanned

Fun fact: i cant appeal the ban because it is a shadow ban so the system says my account is not banned or suspended

https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1003641435751636992 today is a good day

yes, yes it is actually

this would have had implications for youtube, etc

they wouldn't have been able to discrimate someone's videos based on their view point

this would have had wide reaching implications actually

Aren't those people against this ruling technically in the wrong

A baker didn't make cake for a gay couple...
An ouraged person didn't make cake for a gay couple

So technically, everyone who didn't send a cake to that couple is complicit in the crime of chosing not to serve cake?