Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 455836225660780554


2018-06-11 20:43:52 UTC  

this is how they get a monopoly

2018-06-11 20:44:09 UTC  

all of these options are expensive

2018-06-11 20:44:18 UTC  

they are not even options

2018-06-11 20:44:20 UTC  

thats my point

2018-06-11 20:44:36 UTC  

because they are expesive and public nusances

2018-06-11 20:44:53 UTC  

how are ISPs not already a public nuisance?

2018-06-11 20:45:15 UTC  

name a single ISP who's customer service is steller

2018-06-11 20:45:22 UTC  

none, because they don't need to be

2018-06-11 20:45:24 UTC  

they are, your talking about making them bigger nuisances without any payoff

2018-06-11 20:46:03 UTC  

A competing company can't even worry about expense if they can't even explore the option due to regulation

2018-06-11 20:46:17 UTC  

you install a new large storm-drain like pipe line once, then get a lot of space to had lots of new lines for a while, any that is a nuisance?

2018-06-11 20:46:53 UTC  

these pipes which could be used to put power lines in so that you don't lose power every time a tree falls or a drunk driver takes out a light pole

2018-06-11 20:46:56 UTC  

yeah customer service may increase by 10% now that theres 3 competing isps and not just 2 but then you also have a 30% increase in infastructural problems which will effect the overall service of all 3 that rely on that infastructure

2018-06-11 20:47:40 UTC  

you realize that stormdrain either falls on the ips or the taxpayer right?

2018-06-11 20:48:17 UTC  

idk, how much more does it cost to maintain a concrete pipe in the ground over time verse the always falling over telephone poles?

2018-06-11 20:48:39 UTC  

how much does it cost to built it?

2018-06-11 20:49:05 UTC  

were talking about building a 5-10 foot tall wall underground that runs beside every road in the united states

2018-06-11 20:49:32 UTC  

basicly probably costs as much as the road does

2018-06-11 20:49:38 UTC  

That is never going to happen---cost prohibitive

2018-06-11 20:50:12 UTC  

over who knows how many years. idk, if i have the money, i seems like it might be worth while building it in a city or two and then letting other isps rent space in it for cheaper than the current cost to get on a pole.

2018-06-11 20:50:25 UTC  

maintenance would start to pay for itself

2018-06-11 20:50:33 UTC  

make money off my competition

2018-06-11 20:50:53 UTC  

if i lose the war for the actually internet piece, i still make money off the pipe

2018-06-11 20:50:54 UTC  

I don't know for all EU but things unraveled here like this: companies built their infrastructure then lease it to other companies... if you are internet operator you compete for costumers all over but you pay the lease for infrastructure to some .... Speed is unaffected since they are under "lease agreement)

2018-06-11 20:51:04 UTC  

the alternitive is what were doing right now creating ever complex systems of cables ontop of artifical trees or under the ground with the added problem of it being easier to forget where they are underground because they arnt inside the extremely expensive pipe your preposing

2018-06-11 20:51:24 UTC  

and all of thise expense falls onto either the tax payer or the isp

2018-06-11 20:51:31 UTC  

And whoever is going to do that will need to get the local community's permission to do so...pay an annual fee to the government, etc. in other words they are given a monopoly on that. 😉

2018-06-11 20:52:26 UTC  

local government doesn't even approve it to start with, i mean why would they? whatever company is the current ISP can just pay the town not to

2018-06-11 20:52:35 UTC  

the monopoly exists simply because its hard to do this and anyone who trys eventually gets eated up by the larger isps and their cables become comcast's cables

2018-06-11 20:52:59 UTC  

consumers wants competition

2018-06-11 20:53:02 UTC  

"hey, don't undo this regulation and i'll pay you uhhhh.... late fees for missed dues, yeah"

2018-06-11 20:53:48 UTC  

even if the right of way cost is exorberent, its still preventing more taxation on the united states infastructure

2018-06-11 20:54:27 UTC  

because keeping that infrastructure funded by only the government has been working out real well.

2018-06-11 20:55:03 UTC  

actually it sounds like its funded by isps taking up pole realistate

2018-06-11 20:55:19 UTC  

though taxepayer money probably does eventually go into that

2018-06-11 20:55:44 UTC  

fuck, i wish they would privatize roads here just so that there would be real roads, rather than the state government raiding the transportation funds to pay some ex governor 100k a year in pension for retiring at 50

2018-06-11 20:56:53 UTC  

@Arch-Fiend i wasn't talking about just the internet infrastructure, otherwise your comment on "preventing more taxation on the united states infrastructure" would make no sense

2018-06-11 20:57:13 UTC  

"its taxing the infrastructure....by building new and better ones.... yeah..."

2018-06-11 20:57:51 UTC  

also who owns poles is really random and different from place to place

2018-06-11 20:57:57 UTC  

your suggesting a pole for every isp?

2018-06-11 20:58:53 UTC