Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth
Discord ID: 456122660800430080
the JBP question
where in the debate however i am unsure
there found the exact time where he mentiones it
should save you around 30 minutes lmao
Tim, ask Benjamin Boyce he manages to get insider information because he used to go there
One thing to keep in mind with JBP and the right wing is that he's a Canadian, and Canada has an extremely weak right wing.
Him having to comment on the right 'going too far' is probably not something that happens often in Canada, simply because there isn't much of a right wing to begin with, and the overton window in Canada is so far to the left that they can't say or do anything that would seem 'too far' from an American perspective.
hes taught a lot of classes focusing on nazism and its rise
Like in Canada saying "a country should have borders" is considered extreme right wing.
oh another old tweet... more relevant to recent events... https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/464217937516040193?s=20
Or "people should be able to choose the kind of healthcare they receive".
In the US saying "a marriage is a union between a man and a woman" is non-controversial. In Canada it's not an idle question as to whether you could face arrest for saying that.
So Jordan Peterson is probably concerned about the right wing going too far in the same way a Bedouin is concerned about drowning.
the classes are all up on youtube, a lot of people cut them up into smaller bits, but you can listen to them for the most part in whole
Canada has a border with the US so the benefits are probably not as obvious as when you have a shitty neighbor.
JBP is very well informed about totalitarian states, especially of the 20th century
when he asks when the right goes to far, it prolly is in regard of that
I remember him talking about Hitler's table talks and how conservatives are more sensitive to disgust than liberals. If he ever commented about what it looks like when the right wing takes things too far it would probably involve some of the same points.
Basically a cleaning/ordering response going out of control and being applied to tribal groups.
But Peterson has often said that people of with the underlying personality profiles that correlate to liberal and conservative need each other in order to build robust and functional institutions.
An organization dominated by people with conservative personality traits will stagnate, and become rigid and inflexible. Eventually it will fail to adapt to changing circumstances and collapse, or self-destruct through purity spiralling.
hes a enlightened alt centrist
im a radical alt centrist
im a banana
we eighter have a discussion about the different points of view and each bring the evidence in support of our claim to further both our understandings of each others possitions without resorting to falacies
OR I BLOW ThIS PLACE SKY HIGH
this alt business is stupid - there is right/left libertarian/authoritarian no alt-sh*t
i don't think labels are especially useful when referring to one's self or other individuals. they're only useful for broad generalizations of groups or trends.
alt is reactionary
its to mean you nonestablisment verson of a political spectrum
because multiple consiterations put people on the same point of a political compass
the establishment is irrelevant to the spectrum
its not irrelevant to how people collectivize outside the spectrum
if the "alt-right" just mean they want an ethno-state.... then theyre white nationalists... which is on the authoritarian scale
thats not what the alt-right "just mean"s though which is why they arnt that
also ethnonationalism isint the same thing as white nationalism
they still fit on the spectrum.. theres no need for "alt"