Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 457554500920541194


2018-06-16 08:47:37 UTC  

they'd better,

Otherwise its wilfully ignoring the commander in chief

Thats like treason? 😛

2018-06-16 08:47:50 UTC  

I doubt they can outright refuse the president

2018-06-16 08:50:44 UTC  

An unnamed official told The Washington Post

2018-06-16 08:50:46 UTC  

welp

2018-06-16 08:50:49 UTC  

there it is

2018-06-16 08:50:56 UTC  

another unnamed source

2018-06-16 08:51:40 UTC  

didnt the last unnamed white house source they had turn out to be an intern?

2018-06-16 08:52:07 UTC  

I dare say! an unnamed source told me that this time the unnamed source is speaking the truth!

2018-06-16 08:54:34 UTC  

Dont get me wrong, i understand the need for and purpose of unnamed sources

2018-06-16 08:55:43 UTC  

after a certain point they lose credibility and theres really no way to redeem it without naming their source

2018-06-16 09:16:08 UTC  

unnamed sources only work if they're rare

2018-06-16 09:16:15 UTC  

AND, if they have PROOF

2018-06-16 09:16:37 UTC  

you can't go

"An unnamed source told us that the president likes to whisper to the gorilla channel"

2018-06-16 09:17:41 UTC  

but you CAN go "an unnamed source leaked this report with an authentic signature detailing the plan to burn gay people at the stake"

2018-06-16 09:17:45 UTC  

and show it if its there

2018-06-16 10:10:03 UTC  

"An Unnamed source told us, video production news, that Tim Pool is a gay supremacist"

2018-06-16 10:10:35 UTC  

"If we are wrong, it's not our fault."

2018-06-16 14:26:39 UTC  

I just did a podcast with Lior from youtuber lawm itll be up tomorrow

2018-06-16 14:26:48 UTC  

but basically we go over how anyone can legally lie about anyone else

2018-06-16 14:38:07 UTC  

Isn't that Slander?

2018-06-16 14:38:13 UTC  

or Libel?

2018-06-16 14:39:54 UTC  

Lior?

2018-06-16 14:40:00 UTC  

Typo or actual name?

2018-06-16 14:47:12 UTC  

thats his name

2018-06-16 14:48:25 UTC  

Interesting. How deep in do you guys go?

2018-06-16 14:48:46 UTC  

@Deleted User Depends on the context.

2018-06-16 14:49:22 UTC  

hes been doing a few vids on EU article 13 lately

2018-06-16 14:49:51 UTC  

30 minutes talking about sargon vs akilah and how fair use works

2018-06-16 14:50:00 UTC  

then we talked about cassandra and emma roller and how you can defame someone

2018-06-16 14:50:17 UTC  

then maddox and dick and how people can run you through court on purpose without the intent to win

2018-06-16 14:50:17 UTC  

Have you thought about talking to YouTuber Law?

2018-06-16 14:50:33 UTC  

That's who it was.

2018-06-16 14:50:58 UTC  

someone asked him on stream about how article 13 would affect the sargon akilah case.. he said he would have to think about it.. seemed to be really messy

2018-06-16 14:51:14 UTC  

seemed to really throw him off like he was quite stumped

2018-06-16 14:53:18 UTC  

Tim, do you know if the dankula thing is him trolling or real? (him joining ukip)

2018-06-16 14:55:29 UTC  

ukip is generally seen as quite bad here

2018-06-16 14:59:34 UTC  

people can do real things in the name of comidy

2018-06-16 14:59:44 UTC  

i suspect its a matter of that

2018-06-16 15:01:52 UTC  

Sounds ironic a lawyers name sounds like liar

2018-06-16 15:02:23 UTC  

Dank said he was serious.

2018-06-16 15:02:26 UTC  

Where will the AkilahVSargon be held? If it's the UK, Article 13 will fuck over sargon