Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 461313333405024256
I'm pro using that youtube popularity to make possitive change, but I guess they're going into it to fight "the culture war"
And when you call it a war, all's fair
I think they will embarass themselves. Time will tell
Here is another activist journo piece calling for "civil disobedience"
It's funny how after watching Tims video a political Discord server I'm in started having the right and left arguing about who would win in a civil war.
And some calling for it too.
Lel
Ppl tend to write lefties off
The lefties were talking about "how they are the majority" and "they have guns too".
In china commies drowe capitalists into the ocean
Also how Liberals will "stop playing nice soon".
In US there is also the geographical aspect of it
Its no longer north vs south
But coasts vs inland
the inland will riiiise agiiin
problem with UKIP is they split off votes from torys... all you end up with is a labour gov
followed shortly by communism and death
in parliament the tory chancellor threw Mao's book at the labour chancellor .. kinda funny
If this hypothetical civil war were a traditional military confrontation then yeah, the right would probably win. Even putting aside the people involved just the terrain held by each at the onset is enough to swing it in the right's favor. The lefties would be besieged in a few cities, cut off from food and water supplies.
BUT it's not going to be a traditional military confrontation.
It'll look more like cartel violence, at least at the beginning. Assassinations, bombings, arson, etc.
All with a coordinated media campaign.
It's not so easy to pick winners and losers under such conditions.
The right-wingers have a fuckload of guns and ammo but they won't have targets or the will to employ them.
I sometimes hang out on gun forums and they're just as delusional as the lefties.
@Timcast ive listened through all of @Starscream92 (ChefLeopard) video and it sounds very important to me. its basicly a story about fake news that never got any attention. its about a "journalist" who got into various bernie sanders support facebook groups during the election who collected information on the people inside it then once bernie lost the primarys this "journalist" went to various news outlets spreading a story that these people were russian bots. then when the people there tried to get the story corrected it never got contact with the news companys that ran the story and they have faced backlash both politically and personally for it
Sargon is right though, that is more or less what politics is about. Developing narratives to maintain support and getting away with lying
That's why I like Trump. He's not a politician.
Well one reason anyways.
Trump has his narrative and is using it to maintain public support
He doesn't try to hind behind fake words like most politicians though. He says what he thinks.
Most of the "lies" he has been caught in are partial truths, so anyone critiszing him is forced to acknowledge the underlying truth. If they dont point it out or at least nod in its direction then trumps supporters have a built in rebuttal.
Many people would agree with you, they've grown discontent with both sides of the staus quo. To them trump represents a break from the stale political dialogue and a chance to see actual govenrment action to solve issues.
@Arch-Fiend if you need anymore information about this, don't hesitate to contact me or @Canucklehead
If true. Ugh
These are the same pro net neutrality companies
Proves that they aren't in it for "the people"