Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 463757917791846411
This is the video of an interview that four of us did on the Hard Bastard YouTube channel last month. @Canucklehead and I have been working on the story as YouTubers, and we had two Bernie delegate witnesses join from San Diego. @Timcast.
I just finished watching it in pieces here. Good interview.
Because liberals get the bullet too
The FBI is literally investigating every imagined conspiracy theory the lefty media can invent.
@RanStairs who are those people?
its cuz they're too far with the lie, they have to stick with it now and desperately try to find ANYTHING to dent Trump,
Not realising (or perhaps willfully ignoring) the fact that with every grasp, they solidify his core base, and only push the center further away because they'll get tired of this endless nothingness
Trump knows this i think tahts why he's letting them, because when the end of the investigation comes, he'll bring the hammer down on them for wasting all this time. And with every grasp the left media made, the hammer will increase in size
not just time, money too
@ikillomega share it. we're tryna get the story out.
whats this MattesFile?
What do you guys think about this plea deal, and the “ conspiracy theories “
http://archive.today/700xn
he pled guilty,
conspiracy theories are in the eye of the beholder
Molymeme did a completely exhaustive examination of all the sketchy crap that family was involved in. I doubt it had anything to do with the 2016 election.
Just regular corruption.
Old boomer politicians who don't understand tech paying a slimey used car salesman to do their network admin work and getting taken to the cleaners.
Harvard Business Review via Twitter: Breakthrough research shows that diverse teams make better investments. https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-other-diversity-dividend (Archive: http://archive.fo/cqQIj )
I think Marvel wants a word with the writers
@Deleted User Some antifags
From what i gather from that article, their biggest claim to "diversity works" is that since the 50's, Americas Economy went up, and this coincided with the fact more non-whites and wamen joined the workforce.
Bigger workforce increases economic growth, who knew?
and in the end it starts promoting gender bias training etc
few people will tell you this, but financial performance goes up when the number of employees you have increases faster than their labor appreciation relitive to consumption of production
I find it amusing that the local grocery co-op, a cooperative, put in massive self serve checkouts and got rid of a pile of staff. Co-op 😮
i'm pretty sure this article actually supported a meritocracy
"To accomplish that, companies need not explicitly favor a particular race or gender when hiring. Sometimes simple adjustments in the selection process can increase diversity. In one study led by the behavioral economist Iris Bohnet, of Harvard Kennedy School, students were assigned the role of an employer asked to select an employee who would do well on a future math or verbal task. Even though gender was not predictive of performance, “employers” evaluating individual candidates were likely to be swayed by stereotypes, exhibiting a preference for women on verbal tasks and men on math tasks. But when they assessed two candidates side by side, gender suddenly became irrelevant. Evaluators instead focused on past performance—an actual indicator of future success."
that snipped would imply that diversity is actually irrelevant, and as its put itself, from only 1 study
exactly
hence supporting meritocracy
so that would disprove the claim that diversity is beneficial, which is the headline
well, in an earlier part in that article it also "assumed" all skills
are equal
its trying to spin things
saying "look, when you are actually basing things on merit, you will get a diverse staff"
so then its not diversity that is beneficial, but meritocracy
but you see, you are looking for a cause, not an effect. logic doesn't apply here, only bias
nah im looking on what the article claims, and if it supports it, which it doesnt, it contradicts itself
(ironic, given that the article states people get angry when confronted with their own bias... maybe explains the anger of the left?)
oh, it contradicts itself
its leftist in nature