Message from @Pake
Discord ID: 471942782886346753
us weebs are conservative as well
That's the persons bio
They are not a weeb. Weebs like anime girls
**my profile image**
Sorry, should I say anime girls and traps?
rofl
*insert awoo with the maga hat here*
Lmao
he has an alt and a mastodon account so hes fine
@LotheronPrime the EU is sending more Soy?
Are they subtlety trying to destroying us? How European.
Nonono. You got it backwards. We're continuing the SJW invasion of Europe.
*They* are buying *our* soy.
It just makes Europe easier to invade.
...invaded by Russia maybe?
Trump is a Russian pawn confirmed
QED
@pratel that’s inhuman.
Impeach Trump!
`b i g` oof
Twitter is becoming ever more ideologically narrow. This is no surprise and has been happening since early into Twitter's existence. It's effectively a platform for activists and journalists. Us plebs are just there to make up the numbers then the celebrities on it bring in the cash to Twitter.
(That's for English Twitter. Apparently Arabic Twitter is an Islamist shitshow and I've no idea what the political current is in other languages on Twitter).
My take: Net Neutrality is the noose the tech companies have built that they will be strung upon.
They opened the option when they attacked the telecoms. And now they've attacked their erstwhile defenders. Democrats will oppose "censorship" and "fascism" but will struggle to be publicly opposed to regulations or anti-trust actions.
It's clear that the decision makers at Twitter view #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo as positive forces unleashed onto society via Twitter. Most of the rest of us likely disagree, I certainly do. I suspect that Twitter believe they're serving a moral purpose now and will want to increasingly gear Twitter towards facilitating such "progressive" hashtag movements. Eliminating the dissent on the platform such activists face (from "trolls", as dissenters are called) is no doubt something Twitter is trying to do. Reducing the conservative presence on the website is a way of doing that.
The hashtag movements drive huge amounts of traffic to Twitter, so more money is made, making the shareholders happy too. Progressives utilising capitalism, somewhat ironically.
I mean, you've heard of the infamous twit by Jack Dorsey, right?
The civil war one?
No?
Ok I just googled it. Scary stuff. I'm not on Twitter and quite glad. It has been ruined nowadays. It was fun back when it started. Tweeting abuse at random celebrities 😁
Yeah, they're really not hiding it.
Something people have too easily forgotten about Twitter is that ISIS greatly benefitted from using Twitter until they were belatedly cracked down on. It was mainly on Arabic Twitter so western and anglophone media didn't pick up on it for about two full years before finally putting pressure on Twitter to stop it. Twitter was ISIS's main media platform for literally years. Yet Twitter feels no shame over that.
Nah, they just took the technology they developed for that and applied it to domestic enemies.
Just like Google did with adpocalypse and their anti-ISIS tools.
I laugh at how Facebook gets pilloried for providing a supposedly influential platform for a candidate (Trump) in a democratic election. Twitter provided a platform for the preaching of genocide against Yazidis, mass rape and slaughter, brutal theocracy and all the other shit ISIS did. But that was cool. No biggie. Twitter good. Facebook bad.
Both are bad.
Not defending Facebook. Just pointing out how easy a ride Twitter is given by comparison.
Somehow we need to find a way to make people think twitter helped trump win.
Although it did tbh.
Need to get the far left to turn on Jack.
Yeah. Beat them at their own game. Just start yelling "racist Nazis" at Twitter until it sticks.