Message from @Tohob
Discord ID: 474064930283192320
XD some people are mad that we are getting a lobster emoji before an lgbtq flag
love the part where someone points out that lobsters are Gynandromorphs
🦀
thats a stupid looking flag anyway
Looks similar to the pedo flag
lobsters? jordan peterson grows his army
LGBTs are getting close to accpeting pedophillia into their ranks
Yep
I dont think the average homosexual cares
I watched that TEDx talk from that girl talking about pedophilia as a genuine sexuality
I mean, dont want pedos or accept them
I recall some argument as wekk
And while it *may* genuinely be a sexuality, if it is, it doesn't automatically mean they should be embraced by society
I think the fact its a genuine sexuality does not make it something to be accepted. I dont know if this girl is asking for that.
I know that much.
Rape is a sexuality, beastiality is a sexuality, paedophilia is a sexuality. All of which have victims,thus unacceptable
Gay is a sexuality, has no victims
What differences a fetish from a sexuality?
The victim
Fetish falls within a category of sexuality
Like what? I like a specific breast size is a fetish, I like women is a sexuality?
sexuality is big categories like an entire gender or other massive subgroup of people
whereas a fetish would be something like a specific set of acts or traits
i think technically pedophilia could be a sexuality, but one that is by definition predatory and harmful
Because the other party cant concent
Or can be trusted to
yeah
same with bestiality
There is no argument in whether or not they are specialities, of course they are. Arguing about that is just wasting time. The fact they are victim based via the other party can not consent means they are not acceptable in the name of human rights.
*sexualities
Anyone could make a kid or a dog think taking the dick is okay, but that isn't consent because they are unable to understand the situation and effects.
yeah, definitely
Don't dick the dog, don't dick the kids. That's all folks
blurry face for president
Reminds me of that one game that had that discussion
They develop tech to make dogs be able to talk
And find out they are sentient enough to run companies.
`the furries would be so happy`
So they ask, if you manage to make something able to communicate with humans, can they still concent?
It was a wierd game. But it did make sense.