They already fluff results

@Beemann its baked into the web browser. there is no way to stop that

What is baked into the web browser?

look above

The article refers to specific apps "To make that easier for Web users, Mozilla will look at ways to bring anti-misinformation functionality to existing offerings like Pocket (app that lets you maintain a list of articles to read later), Firefox Focus (a mobile private browsing app) and The Coral Project (which provides tools designed to “raise public trust in journalism” and make it more relevant)."

If you were using Firefox on mobile you already played yourself and your poor molten phone

oof

i dont even use firefox on mobile

nor do i use pocket

i have what is called fennic

its exclusive to the f-droid app store

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-europe-45181321

Sweden cars: 80 set on fire by gangs in several cities

I've been getting good mileage out of the f-droid store tbh

I don't care that the product itself is unaffected. The company is tainted

well thats to be said about anyone

nobody can retain a perfect record for very long

just because i haven't seen articles (that i'm sure exist) of google banning alt-right email addresses doesn't mean i trust gmail.

i think its pretty easy to keep a "not pro-censorship" record.

you can say they try to be impartial but when they talk about fighting "fake-news" then say "we are teaming up with the msm", that basically says "we are here to suppress the alt-media"

Google verifiably modifies your search engine results

But it's worth remembering that both use forks of open source browser projects

So if you don't like the "commercial" ver. there are other forks

So this whole Omarosa thing...

Why does it seem like nobody's talking about the fact that Omarosa broke DC laws?

The narrative is above the law apparently

The recordings she made in DC would've been Illegal.

Anyone wants to confirm this? Apparently hes also a repub.

Yep.

Grant's third war was with the KKK

I may have had... outdated info? I was under the impression that DC was a two-party consent state

or rather, district

He is also cited as the source of the term "lobbyists" after complaining about people hanging out in the hotel lobby of his favorite place to have lunch asking for Federal Office Appointments.

Just wondering, Ive heard the KKK was a primarily Dem group

What points to that conclusion?

At the time of the Civil War the Democrates were the party of the slave owners in the south, after the Civil War, the Republicans tried to push measures to ensure there was no relapse into slavery for newly freed slaves

The KKK was formed by Confederate Vetrens and members of the Democratic Party

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan there's some arguments against and it kinda seems to depend regionally but yeah, a large portion of the old school KKK support base were Dems

The political landscape has changed since then

Because there was an uptick in Democrats leaving the Democratic party in the 70s, it's a misunderstood belief that the democrats and the republicans switched places.

What is the best argument against the party switch