Message from @Redneo
Discord ID: 496180767039160321
IMO it is full on indoctrination.
Analysis of Article 13 by a renowned german law firm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtL5VThobJs
Pretty much what i said myself. @Timcast your news videos are at least as problematic as memes, for the record. They are copyrighted at least in europe they are (everything anyone creates is) and with the plattforms being responsible in case copyrighted material does find its way to their plattforms thats a problem as it is hard to prove of that much content that you didnt publish elsewhere before that you hold the copyright - and they wouldnt want to risk it as it could be expensive in case they miss something.
"We know there's been a criminal incident," District Attorney James Martin told reporters at a news conference Sunday. "We have a high degree of confidence that the perpetrator was probably killed in the incident."
```Pretty much what i said myself. @Timcast your news videos are at least as problematic as memes, for the record. They are copyrighted at least in europe they are (everything anyone creates is) and with the plattforms being responsible in case copyrighted material does find its way to their plattforms thats a problem as it is hard to prove of that much content that you didnt publish elsewhere before that you hold the copyright - and they wouldnt want to risk it as it could be expensive in case they miss something.```
Well, our Verfassungsgericht might still kill that law. And when it comes to the Normies and Facebook is full of that shit, the revolution is near...
I don't think that it's a good idea to enforce the Law.
Especially when Facebook and co will be very careful with the Implementation of the Upload filter and you can not upload anything that has any copyright in Europe on it, wich then will include pictures of Cars and other shit, people will get angry. And when the right ones are around that point towards Axel-Springer and other News Outlets, people will boycott those...
Holy crap. I was in Allentown, Pennsylvania like a decade ago.
Eh a car bomb ain't gonna spruce that place up at all.
Wanna bet that the Bomber is a membe of certain Ideology??
Someone called?
I don't know what you would conceivably target in Allentown.
Boom boom boom boom shoot you like a bomber
@Stefan Payne "Anything that has copyright in europe on it" - that includes stuff produced elsewhere, just fyi
Like, there was this case recently gutenberg.org i think?
yeah, thats it
Its based in america and they share books there which are public domain in the US due to the copyright running out.
Well, the copyright ran out in the US where its like 70 years? Whereas here its 70 years after death of author. So they were still protected.
@Bones Can you really perjure yourself on a subjective opinion of what constitutes a lot of drinking?
I don't even think he said he didn't drink a lot, or didn't drink excessively.
I'm not really clear on what specifically the article is claiming is perjury. I was under the impression it was the "I never got blackout/passed out drunk"
Which is itself kinda uhh...
a vague, qualitative judgement
If he were asked "have you ever been drunk enough that you would not remember key details of when you were intoxicated" then maybe, but then again
how could you prove that Brett Kavanaugh saw, heard, or experienced something in a way which could be expected to be remembered
such that it could be considered forgotten in the morning?
It is ultimately internal, subjective, and qualitative
And as long as he is consistent with his _own_ statements about his _own_ subjective, internal, qualitative opinion of that, it seems to matter very little what others say.
even if they say it also under penalty of felony.
And much less so in a random, professionally-cut interview under no penalty, with a decidedly-hostile news organization.
This is a "She said, they said otherwise."
https://twitter.com/EFF/status/1046559134173130752 CA brings back net neutrality and makes building local broadband networks easier
Reading the report Schedrevka linked. It's refreshing to see that this is a matter of record.
This is seriously the most sane print on paper I've read in a while.
@aukkras No, what they've done is _made local broadband networks a concern of the state_, which will probably go very badly since this is California we are talking about.
When "city planners" determine how many fibers travel to you, and force you to pay into _their_ scheme, you are well and truly had by the balls.
Everything bad that's happened with the internet since the repeal seems to be stuff that has to do with tech giants originally built with government grants now owning all the platforms.