Ah

if you mean annoying republicans everywhere and such

Yeah

pretty skeptical about that mob to be honest

it looks like 5-6 people tops

not exactly normal behavior from republicans who ought to be working

narrow angle vertical video taken in an narrow alleyway

Yeah, but nice to see that they bring back what the Dems sowed

they weren't aggressive so that was just trolling

Thing is they need to distance themselves from violent thugs...

something that the Greens in Germany do not do.

this is awesome

in 10 seconds democrats will cry about being threatened by a "mob" 😉

that's not a good thing for republicans, who are trying to frame themselves as the 'jobs not mobs' party.

which is another thing that makes me skeptical about the whole thing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-19/caravan-showdown-migrants-tear-down-guatemala-border-gate-rush-towards-mexico

november 5th they will be at the mexican/us border

just as soros wanted 😉

woah

https://www.facebook.com/TucsonNewsNow/videos/2172774462987368/?utm_content=buffer7f8c0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Video of the caravan at the Guatemala border

Seems like 4000 is an underestimate.

nothing an M60 cannot solve

What's the general consensus here. For or against lethal force when they get to the border?

I'm always of the opinion of reasonable force

If they're armed it's a necessity

There's a lot of em so suppression will be hard either way

I feel like this is a very strongly calculated move

What if you can't stop them with non lethal means? Mexico couldn't.

of course.

If they attack the border and are dissuaded by force then the government look like assholes and everyone shifts pro immigration, if they assault the border and get in then there's more justification for the wall but that's a LOT of illegals

It's tricky

Lethal force won’t be necessary. Not unless they get violent when we turn them back. In that case it would literally be an invading force. That’s not going to happen though.

Why wouldn't they get violent?

@CreativeRealms self preservation. I’m totally fine with responding to violence with violence. I think most Americans are.

Imagine how easy it would be to sway public opinion on building a literal wall and putting soldiers on it if they got violent. I almost hope they do. That would be a win for my side instantly.

There isn't a big buffer zone so it could be a gamble. I also highly doubt that they'd wait by the border to get checked when they get here which is the only way force wouldn't need to be used.

I imagine people like Tim would oppose any kind of lethal force even if they end up being violent. Might split the moderates.

So any thug willing to use violence to get in shouldn’t be blocked? I doubt many people will agree with that. In fact I’m positive those are exactly the people we need to keep out. Many will agree.

They are mixing in with non violent people and there are too many to sort through.