i would guess the use of none-government emails is probably a deep rooted problem within the whitehouse because no one understand IT security.

I wonder if she even has a government email. xD

i would assume so?

even though i'm from the UK, all this recklessness around IT security really pisses me off.

She is in an unpaid position, usually you need to request to get something like that, or be in a position that allows for tax payer dollars to be used for it.

does she work with any classified stuff?

i would've thought they'd give her a government email just to reduce risk of security breaches

also if thats microsofts buisness email service, thats probably more secure then the whitehouse

I mean, it's not like she is the secretary of state and is sending emails with her personal account. xD

the thing that pissed off the most about that is her personal server had no security what so ever.

what is the service?

I mean if it is google, I doubt they'd take that accusation sitting down. xD

huh?

i was saying whitehouse security is probably shit and microsofts is more secure for buisness clients.

ah I found out the service

it is a microsoft system

for her personal email

yeah it said that in the article

i'm assuming its the buisness level services though

i'm not sure if they offer custom domains to regular consumers?

It'd have to be

otherwise there would be no encryption level services. Besides getting emails is pretty secure. Sending them on the otherhand is not.

true.

i'd still trust microsofts services to actually be secure.

unless they've put backdoors in for the nsa :/

I don't think any company would put backdoors... if it ever leaked that they did, they would lose trust

eh true, nsa puts the backdoors in for you without you knowing

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/19/proud-boys-fbi-classification-extremist-group-white-nationalism-report

the more extremists get outed the better

They *are* an extremist group with *ties* to white nationalists.
That doesn't mean they are a group of white nationalists.

Also, if you look at the actual source, which i just did.
Its a document from WA state that *says* that the FBI says that.
Second hand information. Whether or not the FBI actually does or not is actually undetermined afaict

oh wait

thinking about it the FBI also branded juggalos as dangerous people but i don't think that went anywhere

juggalos are only dangerous to the nation's meth supply

are they even still around

They've also labelled ANTIFA as domestic terrorists, FWIW. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-domestic-terrorists-us-security-agencies-homeland-security-fbi-a7927881.html

the left encourages domestic terrorism

i would say domestic violence but that has a whole different usage

I'm sure they do encourage domestic violence as long as its against the correct targets.

i'd say the left encourages *civil* unrest.

not that terrorism is wrong, just people seem to interperate "terrorism" differently