By granting our power to the state

it's the ultimate risk.

Oppress a minority, and you'll soon need to oppress the friends or family of the members of those minorities. Oppress the friends and family, and you will have to oppress **their** friends and family. And the recursion continues. Soon the cost of "a few privileged minorities" becomes the majority.

Because the power we grant

could easilly fall into the wrong hands

It could even fall to our enemies.

It's not the path.

Do not create a weapon you can't afford to see used on yourself.

Exactly.

That's the ultimate argument against authoritarianism.

cuz thats the thing with every ideology

An-com: " 'they' should remove government and we'll all be well"
An-cap: " 'they' should remove government and we'll all be well"
Socialist: " 'they' should seize the means of production and remove the bourgoise, and we'll all be well"
Nazi: " 'they' should eliminate the problem causers and remove the jews, and we'll all be well"
Antifa: " 'they' should eliminate the problem causers and remove the bourgoise, and we'll all be well"

etc etc

But none of them lay out a proper plan how to reach "all will be well", cuz they assume somehow society will discover that after removing 'problem' and it will then deploy this perfect plan to create utopia

"The moment the last goym jew fel, NPC white-pope uncovered a secret scroll to build utopia, and all was well"

Civil liberties are essentially our shields. Every single one of them that we preserve for others protects us, as well.

Exactly

To say that Christians can worship as they see fit, for instance

Helps protect my right to ignore christianity.

you're preaching to the choir here you two 😛

We're spelling it out for onlookers.

particular onlookers

Because that particular onlooker thinks that he'll be able to convert us to his side.

my point was i want to know if Aussie has considered his solution beyond "Someone should fix <problem>, any imo its <problem causers>"

That's valid, and worth knowing. I've just got little patience for it, because I really don't think he knows his ideology.

I'm halfway to thinking that he's actually been a Poe all along.

A Poe?

Look up Poe's Law.

Essentially, I question whether or not he's been a performance art work of satire this whole time.

a joke that you cant tell cuz its close to being serious

Aka the onion these days

lol

That's true.

I generally see a facebook post from The Onion

question if that was a real thing

Through no fault of their own

thats why i wanna know if theres more to his white-nationalism,

cuz "lol pro-hitler"
and "gtfo nub" isnt productive and might be the joke

then see 'The Onion' byline, and that's the only way I know

Poor onion. They have become a real news site

I will credit Aryan with this: He's really refined my stance on Free Speech.

Oh?

Simply by having to deal with him, I've learned full and well to tolerate and combat ideas and speech I disagree with with more speech as opposed to trying to get him banned or blocking him, etc.

😛

The fact that I haven't taken the easy way and just blocked him, that's where I'm getting swole.