Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 449657503660376075
But again: nothing official, just something the government threw around as an idea in a meeting, and got put out by merkel.
Indeed
Merkel's not exactly a bucket filled with good ideas, but if done properly this could be a good initiative
this is the problem with governments, they rarely, if ever, do things properly
Hence why the people are to hold them accountable
This video Vox did is really funny in retrospect. They have been spending the last few days saying it is demeaning to call humans animals. Well at the same time they put out a video on monogamy that constantly refers to humans as animals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCGyLjBjuGI&list=WL&index=16
"Welcome to the Legacy media. Where we will defend criminals and terrorists but dox and threaten children who makes memes about us"
Proof?
" CNN criticized for seemingly threatening to dox Reddit user behind Trump's wrestling video "
Not an actual dox, but a threat
They already hired a PI just to look into him
It was some time ago, but he's a child
Doesn't matter if they're a child or a decrepit old man
There's literally no reason to posture like this
It's not
They threatened to dox because of a damn meme
They wonder why their credibility is down the toilet, and they go about doing shit like this
Negative self-awareness
"But that hypothetical isn’t terribly relevant to questions of social policy in a nation where women are still routinely subjected to domestic violence in their homes"
>Fails to mention that the states linked to that, provided by themselves, show the difference between the number of men and women who suffer from domestic abuse is about 8 percent. 25% men and 33% women. (1/4 vs 1/3)
"gender bias in school"
>Neglects the fact women make up most college grads these days, also links to a study that says there is just less women in stem, but not why. Despite saying just before that it's possible this is just because of choice
gender bias in school? yeah, it's tailored to girls
I don’t get it. Where in that article is Peterson arguing against equality of opportunity?
he isn't
So why is that the title
Because fake news.
The title has literally nothing to do with the article
"Nor would such disparate preferences necessarily justify pay disparities,"
>Fails to cite that once you take away things like time off taken, and difference in jobs, the pay disparity is almost close enough to be statical error and the ability to negotiate
because they make stuff up around what he says to fit what he says into the box they want him in
@Deller basically it is saying "he claims to be for equality of opportunity, yet fights the left who want to end what is clearly not equally of opportunity right now. Then sites bs or our right lies. Or contradicts itself.
they cite inequality of outcome to "prove" that there is inequality of opportunity
"Our entire economic system relies on women performing incalculable hours of reproductive work without receiving any formal compensation at all"
>I.E. society should pay for my baby, not me or the father
who exactly forces women to have kids?
"A single mother raising four children — whose labor will one day help subsidize Peterson’s Old Age Security pension — receives no compensation for her efforts"
....WHERE THE FUCK IS DAD HUH? FUCKING SEND THE BILL TO HIS LAZY ASS
Dead. He killed himself rather than be saddled with unplayably high child support payments
Also she'll recieve her own subsidized old age security pension later, which is the compensation she seeks.
So...
Why does society need to pay for your work, that is what a husband or wife is for. This is why husbands were the bread winners, to pay you in shit. Then you didn't want them being the bread winners, so you went to work yourself. Yet still kept your first job (stay at home wife) but apparently let the person who is supposed to be paying you (the father) off the hook. Or even kicked him out!
single mother of 4 children.... yeah pay her for her poor choices