and if applied in real life with out proper explanation will lead to unethical behaivour

for example senators and such

on laws, theyh ave an abstain vote

but by abstaining they are pandering to the mayority

thers a whole dilema there

Wouldnt the whole choice thing bypass that?

no

So lets get this straight

they abstain knowingly

this si an example of people chosing to be neutral

You dont think not making a choice does not count as making a choice

hyh?

huh?

lol

that sentence needs more negations

that wasnt my point

We lost the point 50 messages ago

my point was, that a person taht is ignorant of the making of any choice and by that they are neutral of it they are not making any choice so they are not responsable

Where did responsibility come into this?

if a person knows the subject at hand, and decides to not to decide then thats a choice

that carries repercusion

Thats assuming the individual also knows the repercussions of his choice

yes

Hey what in the sam hill is goin on here?!

Buut that is not always true

we going dip babe

deep

I prefer dip

so you actually don't think not making a choice does not count as not avoiding making a non choice

huh

I think thats a joke

About negations

ya ppl were saying that not being part of the making of a choice was like being neutral

so by that the person made the choice of being neutral

Well my point was critisizing people who think being neutral makes them immune to criticism

lol

Because by being neutral on a subject, they hold no views and therefore cant be critisized

well depends

Because holding no opinions is an opinion on its own

is all about ethics

Being neutral is being completely immune to 'gotchas'