Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 480302487673241600
that sentence needs more negations
that wasnt my point
We lost the point 50 messages ago
my point was, that a person taht is ignorant of the making of any choice and by that they are neutral of it they are not making any choice so they are not responsable
Where did responsibility come into this?
if a person knows the subject at hand, and decides to not to decide then thats a choice
that carries repercusion
Thats assuming the individual also knows the repercussions of his choice
yes
Hey what in the sam hill is goin on here?!
Buut that is not always true
we going dip babe
deep
I prefer dip
so you actually don't think not making a choice does not count as not avoiding making a non choice
huh
I think thats a joke
About negations
ya ppl were saying that not being part of the making of a choice was like being neutral
so by that the person made the choice of being neutral
lol
Because by being neutral on a subject, they hold no views and therefore cant be critisized
well depends
Because holding no opinions is an opinion on its own
is all about ethics
Being neutral is being completely immune to 'gotchas'
if they were given 2 awfull choices then the best is to stay out of it
That's the short of it.
but it's pretty easy to criticize neutrality though
Someone like me, I don't care about gotchas. I steer directly into them and let them bounce off the hood of my car.
"You're being reductive."
"Okay I'm reductive. So what."
but why you want to go after the neutrals?
why you want to go after ppl
?
sup with this
it's harder to criticize people who don't even say if they are neutral or not. they give no info.
But a lot of people would like to avoid gotchas because they're often so scummy.
lol
You wanna be a nice person but gotchas won't let you.
is like i dont give a fuck about you and your retarded internet tittles fuck off my face