Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 480301904417521666
Or choosing not to choose
of course theres no harm but is unethical
and if applied in real life with out proper explanation will lead to unethical behaivour
for example senators and such
on laws, theyh ave an abstain vote
but by abstaining they are pandering to the mayority
thers a whole dilema there
Wouldnt the whole choice thing bypass that?
no
So lets get this straight
they abstain knowingly
this si an example of people chosing to be neutral
You dont think not making a choice does not count as making a choice
hyh?
huh?
lol
that sentence needs more negations
that wasnt my point
We lost the point 50 messages ago
my point was, that a person taht is ignorant of the making of any choice and by that they are neutral of it they are not making any choice so they are not responsable
if a person knows the subject at hand, and decides to not to decide then thats a choice
that carries repercusion
Thats assuming the individual also knows the repercussions of his choice
yes
Hey what in the sam hill is goin on here?!
Buut that is not always true
we going dip babe
deep
I prefer dip
so you actually don't think not making a choice does not count as not avoiding making a non choice
huh
I think thats a joke
About negations
ya ppl were saying that not being part of the making of a choice was like being neutral
so by that the person made the choice of being neutral
Well my point was critisizing people who think being neutral makes them immune to criticism
lol
Because by being neutral on a subject, they hold no views and therefore cant be critisized
well depends
Because holding no opinions is an opinion on its own