Perfect

Thank you, exactly

Yes, "trigger" refers to a stimulus that activates a symptomatic response of a psychological disorder. Relevance?

My supposed "Buzz Words" Triggered a conditioned negative response; everyone in our society has been the victim of reprisal that forces them to remain overly neutral to avoid being lambasted.

Yes, as buzz words are designed to do. My negative response was more towards the lack of evidence based discussion backing up the claims you made that have words with very specific meanings

Emotionally charged words are made for an emotional response, which is detrimental to argumentative procedure

My "buzz words" are literal definitions while the opposition's argument to my view is entirely comprised of made up words, like "Racism, Sexism, Socialism, Gender, Hate Speech, exetra... "

There is no such thing as Hate Speech.

That is inflammatory because someone created the imaginary concept beforehand.

Your argument thus far has had no mention of hate speech

It is a prime example.

It has primarily concerned the question of wisdom in our president

Hate Speech cannot have a legal definition because it is entirely subjective.

The President is wise, and he is intelligent; a Genius.

Yes, but you're using a red herring fallacy to avoid the question

Also, where is the evidence of his IQ being over 130?

His behavior,

There are many types of intelligence.\

Behavior is not substantial evidence of genius

And genius is strictly defined

Genius behavior is substantial evidence of Genius.

There are countries with specific definitions for hate speech that are not subjective

If you want to just make things black and white to two dimensionalize the argument into either 140 I.Q. + Score or he is not a Genius,

Then, you can end the Conversation there.

Then please don't use defined terms in ways for which they weren't intended

That is the legal definition. The "Strict Definition" you mentioned.....

Yes. It is

We agree

But there is a lot more to it than that.

There are different types of intelligence that are not measured and there are learning curves that are not accurately projected.

There is no accounting for the telomere length of the subjects DNA...

What is the correlation between cellular age and intelligence?

Slower cellular aging, slower phase shifting = Longer developmental periods/

Longer telomere count = greater potential.

But intelligence isn't linked to cellular age, it's linked to synaptic connection

Wrong,

Evidence please?

Your skill level is directly correlated to the amount of time that you spend practicing during the phases of development.
Practice is a requirement, and time is a part of the practice equation.

Yes but "you" are a multicellular being who are being constantly replaced on a microscopic level

Practice produces synaptic connections, which don't depend on cellular age

Longer telomere, slower aging.
Less cellular degradation per regeneration.