Hate Speech cannot have a legal definition because it is entirely subjective.

The President is wise, and he is intelligent; a Genius.

Yes, but you're using a red herring fallacy to avoid the question

Also, where is the evidence of his IQ being over 130?

His behavior,

There are many types of intelligence.\

Behavior is not substantial evidence of genius

And genius is strictly defined

Genius behavior is substantial evidence of Genius.

There are countries with specific definitions for hate speech that are not subjective

If you want to just make things black and white to two dimensionalize the argument into either 140 I.Q. + Score or he is not a Genius,

Then, you can end the Conversation there.

Then please don't use defined terms in ways for which they weren't intended

That is the legal definition. The "Strict Definition" you mentioned.....

Yes. It is

We agree

But there is a lot more to it than that.

There are different types of intelligence that are not measured and there are learning curves that are not accurately projected.

There is no accounting for the telomere length of the subjects DNA...

What is the correlation between cellular age and intelligence?

Slower cellular aging, slower phase shifting = Longer developmental periods/

Longer telomere count = greater potential.

But intelligence isn't linked to cellular age, it's linked to synaptic connection

Wrong,

Evidence please?

Your skill level is directly correlated to the amount of time that you spend practicing during the phases of development.
Practice is a requirement, and time is a part of the practice equation.

Yes but "you" are a multicellular being who are being constantly replaced on a microscopic level

Practice produces synaptic connections, which don't depend on cellular age

Longer telomere, slower aging.
Less cellular degradation per regeneration.

This correlated to the aging process.

The amount of cellular degeneration throughout your development influences and triggers the ends and beginnings of phases of development.

Perhaps, but brain cells don't divide the same way other cells do, and this is moot anyway without evidence of this particular effect affecting our president

Your brain uses 60% of your bodies energy. The memory capacity depends on the long term longevity of certain brain matter, but there is in fact cellular regeneration in the brain; the claims that brain cells never grow back was drug war propaganda that was proven wrong.

Red herring. Provide evidence of Donald Trump being exceptionally intelligent beyond the average scope of presidential historical precedent

Did you watch his live debates?

Have you head about his micro-managing?

Do you see how effective his branding is?

He can manipulate the subconscious like a pro.

He plays 4D chess like a MOFO.

Yes, his debates were minimal at best. His micromanaging is overreach, and his subconscious and branding manipulation is evidence of psychopathy, not genius

LMAO...