Message from @Kepler
Discord ID: 529086043106836492
Gotcha
or like those who say "print more money" when we say we owe so much money to another country. they propose very simple, matter-of-fact solutions that are absurd but sound logical to those who don't know anything about it
I also think I am getting old and cranky. Most debates I participate in I spend the firs 15 min trying to understand how the other party defines words.
same, because they use words that are entirely subjective
brb
@GoldenPhoenix Does the word "Triggered" mean anything to you?
The Psychology term; not the buzz word.
"Protesters have set cars alight and left them to burn in the streets of the capital city,..." So, they set random cars in flame, that'll increase their popularity. -_-
https://www.usanewstimes.online/2018/12/30/paris-goes-up-in-flames-as-the-eiffel-tower-is-shrouded-by-a-pall-of-black-smoke/
WTF is that?
_Western culture_ as term meant the stories of the classical greek and roman empires, the middle ages and the renaissance in primarily europe.
Now
_Western culture_ is synonymous with white male oppressors and the study makes you a racist nazi
Perfect
Thank you, exactly
Yes, "trigger" refers to a stimulus that activates a symptomatic response of a psychological disorder. Relevance?
My supposed "Buzz Words" Triggered a conditioned negative response; everyone in our society has been the victim of reprisal that forces them to remain overly neutral to avoid being lambasted.
Yes, as buzz words are designed to do. My negative response was more towards the lack of evidence based discussion backing up the claims you made that have words with very specific meanings
Emotionally charged words are made for an emotional response, which is detrimental to argumentative procedure
My "buzz words" are literal definitions while the opposition's argument to my view is entirely comprised of made up words, like "Racism, Sexism, Socialism, Gender, Hate Speech, exetra... "
There is no such thing as Hate Speech.
That is inflammatory because someone created the imaginary concept beforehand.
Your argument thus far has had no mention of hate speech
It has primarily concerned the question of wisdom in our president
Hate Speech cannot have a legal definition because it is entirely subjective.
The President is wise, and he is intelligent; a Genius.
Yes, but you're using a red herring fallacy to avoid the question
Also, where is the evidence of his IQ being over 130?
His behavior,
There are many types of intelligence.\
Behavior is not substantial evidence of genius
And genius is strictly defined
Genius behavior is substantial evidence of Genius.
There are countries with specific definitions for hate speech that are not subjective
If you want to just make things black and white to two dimensionalize the argument into either 140 I.Q. + Score or he is not a Genius,
Then, you can end the Conversation there.
Then please don't use defined terms in ways for which they weren't intended
That is the legal definition. The "Strict Definition" you mentioned.....
Yes. It is
We agree
But there is a lot more to it than that.
There are different types of intelligence that are not measured and there are learning curves that are not accurately projected.
There is no accounting for the telomere length of the subjects DNA...