Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth

Discord ID: 467308485491556352


2018-07-13 12:31:09 UTC  

they have the same genes (read: nature) but different environments (read: nurture)

2018-07-13 12:31:58 UTC  

the higher class people tended to have higher IQs, but class only accounts for 20-50% of the difference , depending on the studies

2018-07-13 12:32:34 UTC  

so yes, taking a baby and dropping it in the desert will effect its IQ, to use Tims analogy

2018-07-13 12:33:21 UTC  

but taking that same baby and putting it in a rich family will increase its IQ, but depending on its genetic background

2018-07-13 12:33:53 UTC  

aka if you have less genes that result is less smarts, even putting you in a rich household will not make you just as smart as the other people in the same kind of households

2018-07-13 12:34:41 UTC  

rather yet, if you want more high IQ people, the best solution is to let rich people adopts the highest IQ babies

2018-07-13 12:34:52 UTC  

over the less high IQ ones

2018-07-13 12:35:02 UTC  

they will be more successful as a result (on average)

2018-07-13 12:35:09 UTC  

and benefit society as a whole more

2018-07-13 12:35:21 UTC  

how does one measure the IQ of a baby?

2018-07-13 12:35:32 UTC  

like i said earlier

2018-07-13 12:35:40 UTC  

IQ is a measurement of general inteligence

2018-07-13 12:35:51 UTC  

so you make the babies compete in cognitive tasks

2018-07-13 12:35:56 UTC  

for example

2018-07-13 12:36:05 UTC  

yes, but like what? can it find the tit on its own?

2018-07-13 12:36:21 UTC  

nah thats all nurture pretty much, they can suck tiddy from the getgo

2018-07-13 12:36:26 UTC  

they can also grasp from the getgo

2018-07-13 12:36:37 UTC  

at what age do these tests count?

2018-07-13 12:36:45 UTC  

as soon as they can do a trick pretty much

2018-07-13 12:36:54 UTC  

there are some tricks we all learn as babies

2018-07-13 12:37:05 UTC  

like object permanence

2018-07-13 12:37:34 UTC  

the faster a baby understands object permanence, the higher its IQ is projected to be, if it does not eat any lead paint while growing up

2018-07-13 12:37:57 UTC  

although its IQ will likely still be higher then those that understand object permanence later, and consume the same amount of lead paint

2018-07-13 12:37:58 UTC  

on average

2018-07-13 12:38:00 UTC  

so no toys made in china

2018-07-13 12:38:12 UTC  

a other more simpler test

2018-07-13 12:38:34 UTC  

is to put a lil sticky ball on the forhead of the baby, that it cant sense cause of weight of feeling or anything

2018-07-13 12:38:39 UTC  

and then put the baby infront of a mirror

2018-07-13 12:39:03 UTC  

if the baby swats away the ball using his reflection, he understands the "mirror trick"

2018-07-13 12:39:18 UTC  

the faster a baby learns that, the higher its IQ

2018-07-13 12:39:33 UTC  

first word is another one

2018-07-13 12:39:43 UTC  

now here is a question: does the IQ of when you are an adult ever matter when trying to figure out the likely intelligence range of their kid?

2018-07-13 12:40:07 UTC  

you meaure IQ based on age anyway all the time

2018-07-13 12:40:16 UTC  

you dont compare babies to adults ofcourse

2018-07-13 12:40:28 UTC  

the average baby IQ is 100, just liket he average adult

2018-07-13 12:40:57 UTC  

in general IQ stays static save brain injuries or malnurishment etc etc

2018-07-13 12:41:11 UTC  

till you are about 30, then it decreases

2018-07-13 12:41:21 UTC  

but if 20-50% is nurture, then the IQ of when they are an adult ends up not being helpful when trying to figure out the potential IQ range of their child

2018-07-13 12:41:42 UTC  

the differences become bigger the older you get, and people that excercise less, their IQ drops more

2018-07-13 12:41:57 UTC  

not true grenade

2018-07-13 12:42:01 UTC  

it is helpful