Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth
Discord ID: 467317783823384576
hold on, let me finish on my previous point before you pivot
aite sure
Cytos you still failed to see my point. So let me phrase it this way. Take 2 twin pregnancies. One of a higher IQ mother, and one of a Lower IQ mother, now, hypothetically, take these 2 pregnancies and run them through 2 different timelines. One in which both mothers receive the best healthcare throughout the pregnancy, one in which they both drink. If there is a genetic component, then in both of those tests, the higher should, on average, remain higher, and the lower remain lower.
all i asked was, have they attempted to prove that
well not literally as that would involve multi dimentional observation and we are not quitte there yet i am afraid
however, on average if you have 2 similar IQ mothers and one drinks while pregnant the baby will have a lower IQ then the one where the mother does not drink while pregnant, on average
assuming they drink the same amount if you compare 2 sets of 2 mothers with similar IQs
where set A has 100IQ both but one drinks
and set B has a 110IQ both, but one drinks
if you compare these enough times, and they drink the same amount, on average the baby with the 110IQ parent will be on top in both the non drinking IQ comparison, and the only drinking IQ comparison
on average
as fetal alcohol syndrome is pretty well established at this point
thanks ireland!
I wonder if there's an ideology that advocates for a high IQ ethnostate
yes
the IQnostate is a well estabished thought experiment amoungst the alt right
it would calculate a worthyness of entrance based on your current IQ and your estimated IQ offspring using the regression to the mean phenomenon
(regression to the mean means that even though you might be exceptional in a specific area, like for example IQ but not ONLY IQ, you will not guarantee pass that on to your child, as there is the other partners genes to consider)
high iq ethnostate is the most common behavural trait based ethnostate
this means that if for example a very tall person is more likely then a averagely tall person to have a taller child
but lets say he is exceptionally tall
the odds that his child is exceptionally tall too is higher, but much more likely it will be better then average, but not as exceptionally so
this is because you pass on and posses genes not expressed in you that might be expressed in your offspring, as well as your child not being your exact same genetic materia
unless you be clonin'
but even still then
genes express themselves differenly based on environment after all
which is partially why less empoverished children tend to have higher Iqs
personally i dont think inteligence is omniimportant
ofcourse it is not
but its defenetly in the top
like health is probably the most important
Well.
whoopteedo i have 300IQ oops i died cause of being sick oh well
There's no trait that guarantee sucess
You can be a paraplegic, and still be successful
on the other hand, growing up in a way that wont get you unable to reproduce is maybe more important then health
as you really only need to live till you make a baby
Or be a 50 IQ dumbass and still be a millionaire
he likely wont be for long though
but i get your point
a lot of people who avocate for ethnostates based on inteligence tend to argue that inteligence has a reverse coorilation with agression which they consiter to be a favorible trait though personally i find agression to be just as viable.
it depends on how you express your agression