not informitive, but entertaining

What happens

I don't like either of these cucks

David sherratt is dishonest lying shit

Nick Fuentes is charlie Kirk but worse

just nick wrecking sherratt

You gotta be specially retarded to get owned by nick fuentes

Hey guess

Guess what

!rank

HA

Hm dunno how scores work

Well whos this fuentes?

Well, he's one if those super trad guys

uh, duh: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/how-social-science-might-be-misunderstanding-conservatives.html

That's actually pretty right tbh

I mean social scice looks from the left wing perspective

And well, sociology ive hard of corruption in there

A lot of left wing morals are now right wing

Like Freedom of Speech

Classical liberals

Well, the rights job is to adapt what worked. If the libs discover something that works

But that's the thing, liberals are now the conservatives

The rights job is to keep it that way

Till now, america is a liberal society

The left wants to change that

Progressive in comparison

So obviously, the liberals will be the conservatives

I woudlnt even call them conservative

The transition isn't fully made yet though

Thrre is nothing conservative in aa

aa?

its not convervitive

Hello dyslexia my old friend

in the united states there are 2 main vocal factions of the left wing, and thats left wing defined within the context of the united states. those 2 factions are globalist neo-liberals and intersectional socialist progressives

authority or lack of authority dont matter to either group because their conserns have more to do with serving an ideology (the progressives) or serving corporate interests (the neo-libs)

I wouldn't put the neo-libs that way.

Who mods this server?

rights within the united states only matter to corporations so long as corporations are withholden to standerds equal to or more regulated than the standards of the american citizines

@The Beatles are just ok No one. Welcome to hell