Dude you knew what you were getting into when you joined this channel

"We define harmful content as anything organizing real world violence, theft, or property destruction, or that directly inflicts emotional distress on a specific private individual (e.g. bullying). " where them antifa pages at

Maybe no one reports them because the people who would stopped using Facebook

I'm sure Facebook would have bots that scan key terms

this is Facebook afterall

That does nothing really

no i didnt lol didnt know this was tinfoil hat land. i just enjoy Tims content

where is the conspiracy theory?

@d3adlyz3bra welcome to timfo wars

Trust me, I was on a site (and a group with a bot) that did just that once, didn't stop the shitposters. They just change up spelling a bit and off they go

```No point complaining if they enforced their TOS. Its their right afterall.``` They have to enforce their TOS equally though.

That's the issue. Making a rule that anyone can break all the time, and only enforcing it on the ones they don't like.

I was sarcastic then.

And i pointed it out, my beefi s not them enforcing their TOS

🤷

my beef is how selective it is

Ive reported groups on FB that fit the description.

Makes sense to me that the bigger channels would be banned first tho. more people seeing them and the smaller channels would have less reports

Which means the system isnt automated, someone is looking at the reports.

Or an automated system only kicks off after too many reports

im sure once an account reaches so many reports it is suspended until someone looks at it

And sends those to the top of the stack

And if that is the case, then there is a chance no one even got to see your report

That sounds a little brutish.

I think automated systems will generally at most hide a comment until it gets looked at

Preemptive punishment sounds rather harsh

To you, not to a company

well not true if it was a ban... if the account is suspended pending investigation means someone has to look at it

for it to be banned afterwards

"too many people had a fit, take it down, not worth the bad pr leaving it up"

Well I guess it would be nice to know how FB handles that part.

Then again, whatever they come up with would be abused the second its revealed

pretty much why you have to keep your moderation tactics hush hush.

otherwise they will be exploited.

Then theres the issue with people finding it unfair.

Bureaucracy have difficulty in being innovative

When its very difficult to make it fair

if you want equality, you either ban everything under a very specific set of rules. Or you dont.

Rules for thee but not for me.

The only thing worse than tyrannical rules, is selectively applied ones in my opinion

That's just part of tyranny isn't it?