P3TER_
Discord ID: 259035599242002432
55 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
How can the earth be flat if you can't look 100km to the opposite site of a sea?
A box has 6 sides. If you believe that the earth has a periphery of 40,000 km at the equator, each of the 4 sides that are inline, is 10,000 km long. So that doesn't make any sense.
So you mean that there wouldn't be (many) time zones most of the time? If that's what you mean, I agree.
We can make proper triangles at a spheriod earth too, the only difference is the base line, which would go through the earth.
No, the won't. Imagine a line on which you put a isosceles triangle (with the same angles at the bottom). Now imagine that the line curves, but the points of contact stay the same.
That's right, I could explain it way better with a picture, but that isn't possible, right?
In this case it's not Discord, I think we have to debate more to get the option to send pictures.
Definetely
That's for sure, but that has more to do with the position of the sun than the shape of the earth.
Yeah, I forgot about that
I don't know to whom you're asking this questions?
Ah, allright
So they think that a sun, larger than the earth (although not as large as the sun is, according to NASA) , is inside a type of atmosphere?
But the sun (for 90% sure) can't be smaller than the earth. It would just have been burnt-out.
He did get a warning very quick, didn't he?
In that case the sun can't have burnt for 6,000 or more years.
So they didn't come up with an alternative way of how the sun must produce light?
That's not very creative
Well, actually I was wrong with my 'sun must've burnt-out-theory' if the sun was only 35 kilometres. It appears to be the following: The larger a star is, the faster it burns up.
However, a sun (according to the best-known theory) probably can't be 35 km in diameter and still be a sun.
Yes, but a glober too
I'm a bit bored by the fact that no flat earther joins the debate.
What? May I not explain something in normal words?
That's done to get every country at a 2d map
Of course, no country likes to be in an organisation that's excluding your being as a country by their logo
No, but it's also done to not make any continent look more important than another.
@PhumoZTYPE Flight stops are needed for making a long trip, and that doesn't makes more sense at a flat earth rather than at a globe.
Than we the better can learn you first to think logically instead of trying to convince you.
Because the arguments of flat earth are too easy to reject?
Where's Yeti if you need him?
Yeti is as squint as an naked mole rat...
So the idea of humans being significant รญs Biblical?
We are made as the crown of the universe, but that doesn't mean we're the absolute center.
I mean humans are the most considerable creations, but that doesn't mean that we have to be in the center of the universe, we could be on the edge too. (I don't think we are, because I trust NASA (at least in this case) on where we're located in th universe)
It's not bad to not immediatly trust big companies, but come up with a good reason then.
I don't get convinced by such a minor detail
If they're relevant, yes.
I don't know what you're trying to say with those words?
I'm sorry, but I'm no native speaker, so I don't understand 100 per cent of every sentence.
That part isn't the most difficult, I particulary didn't understand the first sentence.
Ah, now I understand.
Well, a language coincidence isn't the strongest indication in my opinion.
I do
If there was good evidence to proof that it was fake, then why didn't USSR blame the USA for lying and faking the moon landing?
No, that's just another question, but I trust NASA with the moon landing for multiple reasons, here are some of them:
-At a certain moment, there were over 400.000 people working at the Apollo program. It took them 8 years and 100 billion dollars (converted to nowadays-worth).
-Hunderds of thousands of people have witnessed the launch and saw the rocket flying into space. (not on TV, but live)
-Live-TV: They couldn't fake the gravity by slowing the camera down, because the framerate would be too low. (there're some more arguments with the live broadcasting)
-Moon stone (They did bring back material from the moon.)
-They've placed a mirror on the surface, so we can measure the distance between the earth and the moon with the speed of light.
It's quite harsh to blame someone for 9/11, do you guys have any evidence?
Rocket engines need oxygen to burn fuel. And because an engine needs so much oxygen that the surrounding air can't deliver that, they inject oxygen (stored as liquid) next to the engines.
They believe antarctica is in a circle at the edge, so in their minds, the earth gets colder the further east or west you go.
Magma that comes out of the earth (via a volcano) is called "lava".
Density is the amount of particles in a certain volume that affects the speed of certain things attracted by gravity.
That's true
And because it's believed to be caused by the mass of the earth, they've named it 'gravity'
definetely, although as long as we don't know any better alternative, it's safe to say that this is the reason.
55 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1