Message from @oƃǝW

Discord ID: 632061250502918145


2019-10-11 03:39:30 UTC  

Yea...

2019-10-11 03:39:51 UTC  

there's always something that we don't know about...curiosity will drive us to make our own conclusions about what those unknown things are

2019-10-11 03:40:03 UTC  

Perhaps

2019-10-11 03:40:11 UTC  

Ok lol

2019-10-11 03:40:37 UTC  

the second most passive aggressive message you can send

2019-10-11 03:40:40 UTC  

second to 'k'

2019-10-11 03:40:46 UTC  

@SunRazor your theory still needs some work ❤

2019-10-11 03:40:53 UTC  

I totally agree

2019-10-11 03:40:54 UTC  

k

2019-10-11 03:41:40 UTC  

It's been in ``needs some work`` status for the last 10 years, or whenever I first started putting these together

2019-10-11 03:42:26 UTC  

Why that particular idea?

2019-10-11 03:42:40 UTC  

it kind of evolved that way

2019-10-11 03:42:46 UTC  

That’s a lot of work for something that untestable

2019-10-11 03:43:40 UTC  

it all started with curiosity of what would happen if I placed an open-dielectric parallel-plate capacitor at the surface of water (assuming the water is not conductive)

2019-10-11 03:44:08 UTC  

I was interested in how the presence of water between the plates would affect the stored energy of the capacitor

2019-10-11 03:44:34 UTC  

if the charge is kept constant

2019-10-11 03:44:38 UTC  

wait what's your theory here?

2019-10-11 03:44:59 UTC  

space is flat, gravity is a gradient in the permittivity and permeability of the vacuum

2019-10-11 03:45:10 UTC  

that's the theory

2019-10-11 03:45:24 UTC  

I mean that's the claim

2019-10-11 03:45:45 UTC  

gravity being a gradient? that's...interesting

2019-10-11 03:45:48 UTC  

water has a dielectric constant of about 81

2019-10-11 03:46:08 UTC  

so if you kept the charge on the plates constant, and filled the space with water

2019-10-11 03:46:13 UTC  

do you know what happens to the energy?

2019-10-11 03:46:24 UTC  

it goes down

2019-10-11 03:46:31 UTC  

there is a loss of potential energy

2019-10-11 03:47:08 UTC  

so I predicted, if you placed an (charged) open dielectric capacitor at the surface of water, the water will be pulled up

2019-10-11 03:47:30 UTC  

the potential energy of the capacitor will be a function of how much water is between the plates

2019-10-11 03:48:06 UTC  

and since how much water is between the plates is a function of the position of water, it means there is a gradient in the potential energy of the capacitory as a result.

2019-10-11 03:48:15 UTC  

and when you have a gradient in potential energy, you end up with a force

2019-10-11 03:48:17 UTC  

<@632060330834395153> is space fr flat?

2019-10-11 03:48:33 UTC  

Quick question, what shape is the earth ? @SunRazor

2019-10-11 03:48:42 UTC  

He is an astrophtsiciss also

2019-10-11 03:48:49 UTC  

now, since all atoms have protons and electrons, then ALL atoms are charged capacitors

2019-10-11 03:48:52 UTC  

African space man

2019-10-11 03:49:08 UTC  

and since even neutrons contain charged quarks, even neutrons are charged capacitors

2019-10-11 03:49:52 UTC  

Quarks?

2019-10-11 03:50:01 UTC  

@Matt77 the shape of the universe is unknowable at the moment

2019-10-11 03:50:02 UTC  

so I considered what if (what would the math look like if) the gravitation force was reall the same phenomenon as water being pulled into the the parallel plate capacitor

2019-10-11 03:50:18 UTC  

and that the gravitational force was the result of a gradient in permittivity of the vacuum

2019-10-11 03:50:36 UTC  

Yes but sunrazor said it is the flat