NO
Discord ID: 474913480374484992
127 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next
Is this an ancap server
What is lcu
I do not have any questions
Danke
It's okay
No
I have many German friend tho
What
Why
Please don't kill me
I need something to be explained
What the fuck is the lcu
Most are ancaps?
You are?
Not very helpful considering how many ideologies are considered voluntarist
But ok
Talk when you're home
I don't want any accidents
What is pneumaic ethics
In short
Can I have the debate role
You can hold neutral ground tho
Especially when a person is making an unfalsifiable claim
Which server?
Are you atheist or agnostic
That's impossible to prove
It's impossible to prove both ways
I think there's a branch of philosophy related to proofs and shit
I'm agnostic
If nothing changes with some assumption(say, deism) then it *could* still be true, and therefore the assumption cannot be disproven
Isn't a creator the same thing as a prima cause
He could say that atheists are claiming that God doesn't exist
Isn't that agnostic
No evidence
Atheist say they *know* God doesn't exist
Agnostics say that they don't give a shit
Lack of evidence is not proof
Why do these people look like potatoes
Because those are empirical sciences
Philosophy is more than empiricism
Far more
Scientifically speaking, you could "prove" that God doesn't exist due to lack of evidence
We aren't talking from a scientific perspective, we're talking philosophy
If you are dead set on empiricism, that's fine
But you also need philosophical backing for your claim that empiricism is the only method to prove or disprove a claim
I've read these in cathecism lmao
If they're a Christian, you've got them
But not all deists are theists, and not all theists are christians
Logic need not be backed by perception
What are those
"what we actually are"
By perception, I mean understanding the world by seeing it, feeling it or using any of our other senses
Philosophy is based on logic
But logically speaking, you *can* add a logical unit to a logical sentence and not change the truth value of that sentence
Its like that gardener problem
You cant see him
Can't feel him
Yeah
At the core of the rationalism vs empiricism debate is whether adding a logical unit to a logical sentence without changing it's truth value make the addition potentially valid, without any perception of it in the real world
Which theory do you subscribe to
String?
M?
And which variant?
Theists believe that God does shit
Deists believe that God was prima causa and nothing else
@Jonathan The Shaman so you believe that all forces are the electromagnetic force?
Or do you believe that all forces are manifested in the electromagnetic field
What do you mean when you say "means"
What are these "fabrics of reality" you speak of
I don't think your theory is very recognized in physics
I prefer string theory, if that's what you mean
Oh I see
Does it have a name?
Long ass name, if I do say so myself
For some reason I had to get a degree in physics to do CS
Is that normal?
This is your own creation?
Any journals yet?
People will call you a bootlicker @Selganor
How is that even possible
That's literally minarchism
Maybe polycentric?
Literally first avengers movie
@Selganor in what system?
Hello
How can I counter the BCCF
@Jonathan The Shaman the cosmological argument for god
Pneumaic ethics is basically the NAP change my mind
Isn't panarchism contained within anarchism?
Can I plug a debate server here?
We kinda need to destroy some coms
This is an avengers-level threat
In what?
K
One sec
It's quite small
This is gold
127 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next