Message from @NO

Discord ID: 617951681061191682


2019-09-02 05:15:36 UTC  

What are those

2019-09-02 05:15:50 UTC  

With some <:lcupill:615072959786385448> sprinkled in

2019-09-02 05:15:57 UTC  

Perceptions flawed technically, can’t even tell atoms don’t touch with our senses

2019-09-02 05:16:05 UTC  

What are what?

2019-09-02 05:16:21 UTC  

"what we actually are"

2019-09-02 05:16:32 UTC  

LCU advocates

2019-09-02 05:17:16 UTC  

The emotes bacard

2019-09-02 05:17:30 UTC  

Its us facepalming

2019-09-02 05:17:30 UTC  

By perception, I mean understanding the world by seeing it, feeling it or using any of our other senses

2019-09-02 05:17:40 UTC  

<:LCUEmoji:612151606552559617>

2019-09-02 05:17:46 UTC  

Philosophy is based on logic

2019-09-02 05:17:59 UTC  

Only gets us so far, with the naked senses at least

2019-09-02 05:18:08 UTC  

But yes it is based on logic

2019-09-02 05:18:27 UTC  

But logically speaking, you *can* add a logical unit to a logical sentence and not change the truth value of that sentence

2019-09-02 05:18:35 UTC  

Science is the advanced versions of a testing method based on non contradiction and consistency

2019-09-02 05:18:58 UTC  

Its like that gardener problem

2019-09-02 05:19:03 UTC  

You cant see him

2019-09-02 05:19:04 UTC  

Logical chains are like that, kinda like <#612544114965348404> the ethical law of the LCU

2019-09-02 05:19:07 UTC  

Can't feel him

2019-09-02 05:19:14 UTC  

Or the clock maker concept

2019-09-02 05:19:21 UTC  

Yeah

2019-09-02 05:19:25 UTC  

He Christian version technically

2019-09-02 05:19:50 UTC  

The

2019-09-02 05:20:46 UTC  

At the core of the rationalism vs empiricism debate is whether adding a logical unit to a logical sentence without changing it's truth value make the addition potentially valid, without any perception of it in the real world

2019-09-02 05:21:31 UTC  

If all of reality is the same ball of energy interacting with itself the causal connection problem isn’t a problem anymore

2019-09-02 05:22:09 UTC  

Most field unifying theory potential hypothesis’s are leaning towards something like that

2019-09-02 05:22:33 UTC  

Which theory do you subscribe to

2019-09-02 05:22:39 UTC  

String?

2019-09-02 05:22:42 UTC  

M?

2019-09-02 05:23:30 UTC  

And which variant?

2019-09-02 05:24:23 UTC  

Other, I call it electromagnetic field interaction through wave expression, wave being defined as a wave interpretable through code, it causes what I call electromagnetic diffusion which causes all of the different energies and forces we are aware of.

2019-09-02 05:25:16 UTC  

<:591129245288497183:614732768148062229>

2019-09-02 05:47:27 UTC  

A deist is a theist, a weak one

2019-09-02 05:49:42 UTC  

Theists believe that God does shit

2019-09-02 05:50:01 UTC  

Deists believe that God was prima causa and nothing else

2019-09-02 05:50:27 UTC  

They're still variations of theism, they're only divided by extra claims

2019-09-02 05:50:30 UTC  

@Jonathan The Shaman so you believe that all forces are the electromagnetic force?

2019-09-02 05:51:23 UTC  

Or do you believe that all forces are manifested in the electromagnetic field

2019-09-02 05:51:36 UTC  

In a weird way, not the way it sounds, like, think about from our side of things they look separate, but in truth it’s the same force diffused over various means

2019-09-02 05:52:00 UTC  

What do you mean when you say "means"

2019-09-02 05:52:21 UTC  

Do you believe in a higher power or a Godlike principle, if the answer is "yes", then you're a theist, then it splits into different kinds and shades of it the more you look at the claims and split down further