Message from @NO
Discord ID: 617948165341184030
He muted me before I could respond over and over
@Jonathan The Shaman teach me the ways to combat his beleifs
I have my own server set up to format some shit
But to respond to you
Are you atheist or agnostic
Atheist
That's impossible to prove
1. Why does this logic not apply to every deity, fairy’s, etc?
2. Why do you not believe in every other deity?
3. Why could god not have been behind evolution? ( for a wrench in their thoughts)
It's impossible to prove both ways
Why should something without evidence be worth disproving?
A claim without evidence, requires none to dismiss.
I think there's a branch of philosophy related to proofs and shit
The same logic that leads towards anarchy leads toward atheism
☝💯
Since you’re an ancap
I'm agnostic
If you want to keep your arguments close to your chest or develop them elsewhere
I’m agnostic to a prime cause or not, and if so, what it is.
I’m atheist towards a creator and involver.
I’m anti theist towards religion
If nothing changes with some assumption(say, deism) then it *could* still be true, and therefore the assumption cannot be disproven
I can make specific channels for each topic
I need a logical defense for atheism
A creator is a prime cause, but a prime cause doesn’t have to be a creator being
Lets say the BOP is on me
False
That’s switching the burden
He claims its an atheist cliche to claim that
Burdens on the one with the claim
But he tricks people into making claims
Religion can’t prove it beyond personal experience, which where does that get you in court and science
True
He could say that atheists are claiming that God doesn't exist
Doesn’t matter, not the atheist burden to reach
We’re claiming there’s no evidence so why believe
Isn't that agnostic
No evidence
Why not believe in ra, oden, Zeus, etc
Atheist say they *know* God doesn't exist
Agnostic is unsure
Agnostics say that they don't give a shit
Atheist is against the idea of a deity due to a lack of evidence