Message from @NO
Discord ID: 612680605934682162
You are?
A voluntarist
Not very helpful considering how many ideologies are considered voluntarist
But ok
@NO okay, I stand for ethical law, negative rights, subscriptive based ideas, privatization, etc.
Driving again, will respond when I’m stoped again
Talk when you're home
I don't want any accidents
Oh I mean like at McDonald’s, I stoped after driving my wife off at work, next I stop at McDonald’s to eat, then I’ll drive home, not texting and driving
Thanks for the concern in any case
Ayyyy get me 10 piece mcnuggets
What are your questions?
Where you at?
He’s asking what the lcu is, read above, I never explain it well to the varying voluntarist
😅
<a:pepedance:539480664316051457> <:vol:612152059218755585> <a:pepedance:539480664316051457>
The LCU is basically a form of governance based on an ethical position. That being pneumaic ethics.
It is a voluntary one.
In short
Had we not been raided i would've just copy pasted it.
An ethical set that is a new angle on negative rights
Balancing the consequences and actions
Instead of one or the other
Structured in principles.
Starting with non contradiction and consistency
And true jeebus, ancoms and having to destroy stuff, guys can’t be like romerlin
heh, douchebags will be douchebags regardless of ideology
☝💯<:Fedora:612526847749652493>
Where’d he go?
Still good @Jeebus no changes
aight
removed it
Some guy asked if by both parties are the same I meant like coke and Pepsi...
My response was
More like how one tissue says it’s more durable and the other claims it’s softer.
People care more for titles than context, if you look at the context, there’s more that is the same than is different.
Like how durable does it need to be, and softness to a point matters, if it’s too soft, it’s not durable, if it’s too durable, it’s not soft, too much of either and you don’t have toilet paper, you have fragments and a mess or sand paper.
Not a bad analogy
Thank you