Whistler
Discord ID: 257593461618769920
87 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
you guys discuss with people that aren't flatearthers/truthers or whatever?
hello
ok
why is the climate propaganda locked?
bbl
looks curved irl too ๐
why are some of the rooms accessible and others not?
^
do you mean roles?
what do i need to pick for the climate change room?
the government spends thousands of dollars to load planes with chemicals to poison its people despite no one ever seeing any of these chemicals on a plane ever but the government wants its workforce and tax base to die
deafened?
it is real though
that image shows a curve
bbl i need to do stuff
btw that claim about domes? refers to ice domes which are found all over the arctic. Natural glacier features.
"all the asian coloured people"?
how is that trolling?
bizarre
of course
hit piece?
stupid fragile minded little prick
bad word usage - like kicking someone out of the conversation for pointing out your inability to put evidence forward
too scared to have a real conversation i guess
why am i banned from the convo? i didn't insult anyone
why am i banned from the chat?
@Elon Hawkings ask these people why they blocked me from the chat?
@!GPT you're a coward
I muted no one
I can't get in i've been blocked
I can't get in, i've been blocked
not sure what part of that isn't clear; when i click on the chat it doens't let me in. if you want me to join you'll have to find out why i'm blocked
i can't, when i click on it it doesn't let me join
then your server isn't working properly because when i click on it, i cannot join
how exactly do you want me to join, i've just said three time it won't let me
yes, all those pics by NASA. All fake. Obviously ffs
you can prove that of course
yes some pix are composites, not ALL of them from every space agency across the planet
and you can prove that?
yes
optics
how do you think you see further over elevation. how do you think things on the horizon seem to 'rise up' when approached? ships coming over the horizon for example
911 was the result of terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings. Quite simple really, no conspiracy required
yes, it was damaged and its structural integrity failed over the course of several hours
@Seeker of Truth you haven't established there is no curve, you've just denied it. I hgave you observable phenomena for which you have no explanation
@Human Sheeple fires can weaken steel's structural integrity and the buidling had taken damage from the other buildings over the course of several hours. It didn't fall into its own footprint either
@Seeker of Truth you asked for proof and I gave you easily directly observable facts which you just deny. Feel free to back that up with proof
@Human Sheeple that isn't what I said. I didn't say it becomes molten, I said that, at high enough temperatures it loses its structural integrity
@Human Sheeple if it was melted, then it was by definition weakened, right? Can you point to a single building held up by molten steel?
watching footage isn't evidence
@Human Sheeple yes, fires are hot especially when the building's sprinkler system isn't working
why do you keep quoting 1500 degrees? steel starts to weaken at under 500 degrees
if you believe the official reports, why are you asking me questions
No idea why should I care what barry jennings says?
Please provide better proof that nano-thermite was found than a truther website
Larry Silverstein was not referring to a plan to demolish the building, that's been debunked a thousand times
Yes, everyone who disagrees is part of the conspiracy, right?
still waiting for that proof that the entire world's scientific agencies are succesfully putting out fake pictures and facts
weeee! I can make up science!
how would tropics work on a flat earth?
there's a measles outbreak in new york apparently, but vaccines are a lie!
nope, there isn't
science is bad! look my kids are sick! hooray!
again...provide evidence
i doubt you even know what feminism is
anyone thinking Trump, a reactionary institutionally bigoted opportunist billionaire, is on their side is delusional
whether or not climate change is being used by people for their own benefit is irrelevant to the claim that the climate is changing due to man's output. And we can prove that
the scientific consensus is over 95% in favour of climate change, what evidence would you like me to show you?
there are a few that don't agree, but they are an absolute terrifying minority. But the conspiranauts experience confirmation bias so they are the ones they listen to.
where's the evidence of the ice wall
lol
sure lets discuss it
you people are backward
evidence of ice wall please
so you can't actually prove there is an ice wall surrounding your stupid version of the earth, the one that all of science disagrees with and laughs at you for being stupid enough to believe in
exactly; things we've seen and known for centuries...fake and a conspiracy
whatever
87 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1