1 year of a devastating disease

yes it was

i can tell you first hand that it was stupid

no, the collectivization had happened way before the holodomor

no, they developed a fuck ton of themselves

the labour force was mostly russian anyway

and generalyl from the old ussr

they imported a ton of workers here(baltics)

gdp does not matter ins ocialism

well marxism leninsm

no, because the profit isnt an incentive

quality of life and security was much higher then than it is now

it did not

then healthcare was accessible
Food was accsesible
everything had been taken care of

now, people die because they cant afford healthcare

it wasnt

it really wasnt

no it was not

food standards were way higher then than they are now in russia

way more have been under capitalism

it really was not

>REAL CAPITALISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED BEFORE

>NOT REAL CAPITALISM

first of all it has
second of all it cant work in a modern society

big guys would establsih a state quickly

because it benefits them

they wouldnt have a choice really

because oligarchies would pop up

here is the thing, companies hate competition

most people wouldnt have a choice really

you keep thinking that you have a choice to work

no it doesnt

if the means of production are owned by private individuals its capitalism

>economic freedom again

did you read the defintion of mutualism?

except thats impossible

because the state is under the control of themarket

things like lobbying show that

how would you prevent lobbying or the establishment of a state like society?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_market_anarchism

question
would banning slavery in a free market make said market unfree?

fuck the state honestly

nah not really
best scientist in the race was korolev

and he died because he was gulaged by stalin

released after the second world war

but that fucked his health up

the soviets bulit more arms than the americans

no they were not lmao

well, korolev was a much stronger scientist than von Braun

but, korolev died

and after he died the soviet space program collapsed

AK is a wonder of technology

because of how simple it is

it super hard to kill an AK, and fairly easy to make one

then how did you lose against a horde of farmers with AK's

lmao

ah yes
germany won ww2

casualities do not matter

the goal does

vietnam had inferior technlogy
so they used mass charge tactics

america lost ground

america lost south vietnam

slavs?
why are we discussing insects here lmao

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ the AK is inferior as a rifle

but it is surperiour in the fact that its simple

it doesnt jam

it will work fucking anywhere

its simplicity makes it such a strong weapon

yeah the M4 is better, but its a lot more complex
and that complexity is a big problem

well, it isnt
its just ak is ridiculously simple

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_AK-47_and_M16#Reliability

AK is good because its simple
here is the thing
the m16 is like a sports car

and the ak imore like a 4 by 4

sure the sports car is fast and quick
but have it drive through a muddy forest and see the results

depends where

not when it jams in the dirt

or sand

like it did in vietnam and the desert conflicts

no, it was extremely hard to clean, and it jammed frequently in jungles even with correct ammo

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953110.pdf
here is the army report on the m4

yeah AK is amazing for mass production

AK is extremely well suited for guerrila war in horrible conditions

f. Many cases of a stuck or jammed selector lever were
reported.
It was not possible to correlate the kind of lubricant or method of
lubrication with malfunctions, not was such correlation possible
with ammunition of a particular type or make.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953110.pdf

military report of the m14

they have various complex structures such as gas valves and all

this is vietnam war era

he was arguing that m14 was surperiour to ak

i do agree
m16 is a lot better than the ak
but the AK is a lot easier to mass produce

@el pebble absolutely right there
fascism is just a cover for capitalism

also dont forget franco

technocracy effecitvle

y

though not really fascism i concede there
most fascists hate him

not really

he was a technocartic dictator obsessed with himslef

he only said he was a falangist then he showed them the door

fuckign based

greater gibraltar when

they want to be british really