"no abrams has been destroyed by anothr tank"

i have seen multiple videos of american crews needing to run cuz of hits from enemy weaponry

its not an immortal tank the tanks arent destroyed but out of commission and in need of repairs, battle incapable

this is also soviet weapons doing this

no modern munitions. No one knows how an abrams will actually hold up against modern tanks of the world. Russian or otherwise.

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ the AK is inferior as a rifle

but it is surperiour in the fact that its simple

it doesnt jam

it will work fucking anywhere

its simplicity makes it such a strong weapon

yeah the M4 is better, but its a lot more complex
and that complexity is a big problem

@ritasuma How is it complex

@Bogatyr Bogumir No Abrams tanks have been destroyed by an enemy tank

thats literally a fact

well, it isnt
its just ak is ridiculously simple

and it's not even the newer abrams

it's the older ones

AK is simple but it's not good

the MP40 is simple

lets use that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_AK-47_and_M16#Reliability

AK is good because its simple
here is the thing
the m16 is like a sports car

and the ak imore like a 4 by 4

then the M16 is miles ahead

sure the sports car is fast and quick
but have it drive through a muddy forest and see the results

just because it's simple =/= good

and thats not a good comparison

depends where

the M16 can be used anywherre

not when it jams in the dirt

or sand

like it did in vietnam and the desert conflicts

vietnam jamming was due to the wrong ammunitions being used

apart from that it rarely jammed

no, it was extremely hard to clean, and it jammed frequently in jungles even with correct ammo

No it didn't

the whole reason it jammed was due to the ammo

Generally as a weapon of war depends who is using it. Anyone who needs a ton of weapons etc will prefer the AK

anyone whose got money to spend will go AR platforms or similar platforms

the AK12 is going "tight fit" not without reason

as in it actually has a dust cover now