i can tell you first hand that it was stupid

no, the collectivization had happened way before the holodomor

And the stagnating economy after the USSR stole and seized technology and equipment from the west

the case of the ussr isn't mis-management

it's mis-take

And used it to develop more their underdeveloped country

and the mass annexation of countries

Giving a strong labour force

no, they developed a fuck ton of themselves

With literally tiny freedom

the labour force was mostly russian anyway

and generalyl from the old ussr

except the annexation which added millions

they imported a ton of workers here(baltics)

and the fact that the economic growth decline was due to the fact that socialism was inefficient and the technology/equipment gained from the west was used up

and they could not innovate efficiently apart from stealing and getting help from outside

gdp does not matter ins ocialism

So they started to do shitter and shitter until they collapsed

well marxism leninsm

Yes it does

no, because the profit isnt an incentive

It’s just another excuse

For socialists to deny history

quality of life and security was much higher then than it is now

lol

Not even close

woltros I think you're ignoring a key aspect there

USSR had terrible quality of life

GDP does not matter in a complete communistic society as said society is "global"

it did not

but with a country which imports and exports

yes it did

GDP does matter

It was dog shot

That’s why millions fled the country

it was absolutely terrible

First hand accounts, empirical evidence

and the rights of citizens were seen there

profit might not be an incentive within the system but it remains an incentive of the system on a global scale

then healthcare was accessible
Food was accsesible
everything had been taken care of

The personality cult country