https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Polderman-et-al.-2015.pdf

debating in good faith is cowardly

one must snake out of any concession to be victorious

Schopenhauer was right

iq largely dependent upon neuroplasticity

you can make large changing in iq through working memory tests and reading

im a man of facts and science

ask and you shall recieve

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2011/10/20/141511314/iq-isnt-set-in-stone-suggests-study-that-finds-big-jumps-dips-in-teens

We have controls that show the plasticity of iq

btfo race realist

thanks for posting that ban

i think there are natural associations with pain and sex in that they are both expressions of dominance or submission

and then that can either be increased or decreased depending upon upbringing

well, torture happens because people have a desire to express power, but if you take sexual actions, i wonder if there is a clear neural distinction between that and domination/submission

there are so many aspects of the brain which aren't clearly delineated

"The weak and the botched shall perish: first principle of our charity. And one should help them to it."

If you watch tv you are a filthy boomer

bad conscience came about through the slaves, not the elites

and then there is the hegelian master slave dialectic and all that jazz

well, that is why you rape in excess tromm

genghis khan was the ultimate chad because of how much seed he spread. Sure some killed themselves and so forth, but in the grand scheme of things, he had a lot of offspring

all justification is ad hoc

values are subjective and relative. Objective morality would have to come from some type of metaphysics

genetics do not completely determine moral values. moral values are the lowest in terms of heritability

morals are not behaviors but beliefs of good and bad

that translate into behaviours

higher level abstraction is contingent upon many rational moral valuations

when we moralize we abstract

decisions are filtered into the frontal lobe

so there has to be a level of abstraction no matter what

and then things often times loop

Christianity is a false metaphysics though lmao

You having a framework of good and evil is irrelevant to its actual existence. Christianity demands aversion of sin which can be viewed as a substitute for instinct

but Christianity is ultimately a negation of life. The ideal of asceticism. Assuming that truth can only come about through the denial of life

Asceticism is the highest value in the bible

So essentially purposeless suffering. Trying to pursue the afterlife requires doing away with current existence. It is the ultimate negation of life.

and that is why with religion you have eschatology

Is that thus spake zarathustra sotto?

chad

and he has the right to save your posts

respectable. shit can get autistic sometimes. gotta put people like that in their place

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP_6oB1Sxkw

christianity values chastity as one of its highest values

enough silliness on reproductivity

Christianity can be epitomized not by the values it espouses, but by the values it negates. It is anti life

Chastity is contingent upon characteristics negative to reproductivity. Asceticism is anti-life. Eschatology is pro-death.

I don't think desiring death is unnatural. People want comfort, including the illusory comforts of religion, and the necessary conclusion to comfort over suffering is death.

a surprisingly large amount of people don't know about the 30 year war. History is taught like shit in public schools

i know a lot of very paranoid people who delete their everything b/c they think the gov is watching them

supreme narcissism. but i don't know why this guy does

maybe it is so that people can't accuse him of holding any position?

that he deletes everything

i know what you mean

broad headedness is a sign of intelligence for males

wait ill cite

https://www.medicaldaily.com/facial-features-predict-iq-men-long-face-and-wide-set-eyes-make-men-look-smart-not-women-273710

it says broadheaded is one of the features that predicts iq

wait i read this a while ago

i think im mixed up. my bad

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24651120

broad "face" is associated with lower intelligence.

i was completely mixed up

very facile definition of white dr strangelove

compromising is different from the establishment of facts

Life is struggle, and the more you struggle, the more meaningful your life will be.

I feel like you guys are just trying to find fault in what Banjod is saying. Good is what you make it

Moral nihilism isn't illogical because there is a clear distinction that can be made between the emotional and the logical. Good and bad is a matter of preference. Moreover, one can not live in a society without both modes of thought existing.

Relativism also doesn't assume equality

relativism declares that under certain contexts something can be either good or bad

while the moral nihilist declares that there can not be an objective stance on morality

moral nihilists can have preferences too

well, the opinion stems away from the fact that no moral objectivity can be claimed

falsely though. don't be autistic about it hahahaha

those systems are ad hoc

the system is axiomatic

it is assumed that the morals are objective

no epic. That was my explanation as to how they are ad hoc

okay buddy

if you believe in metaphysics, then yes, you can claim they are objective. I don't by metaphysics. I can't imagine how you would take any other position for objective morality though

sure, they can be flexible if you believe in an objective moral system

I know his argumentation epic style, but it is just an extension from ignorance of infinites which would assume logic is only a tool to ignorance so we must extend beyond the material world into metaphysics

and playing with unknowns is nothing but theorizing. At least when it comes to infinites, we dont need to extend passed our reality

No, i know his argumentation

you don't seem very bright epic, so i wonder if you know it

would you be kind enough to explain

I come from the perspective that logic is just our own construction on the basis of our limitations

looking outwards to an infinite universe

identification from the basis of negatives, but anything can be defined by a negative, and that is just feigning the question

but there is more to it than that epic

ya i agree

I'm not assuming logic to exist independent of consciousness

I think if you were to believe in a god, transcendentalism is the fairest approach to go about it

but i wonder how you go from deism to theism from that approach?

👌