for anyone honest enough to see it

falsely though. don't be autistic about it hahahaha

those systems are ad hoc

not false "ahahaha"

nor are they ad hoc

the system is axiomatic

it is assumed that the morals are objective

nor are they axiomatic lmao

anyway, I'm not about to explain how you get to objective morality again

you obviously know very little of theology, especially monotheistic theology

no epic. That was my explanation as to how they are ad hoc

okay buddy

it's not objective in the sense you want it, which is a factbook of life

but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist

any good moral system is flexible

because you have to deal with reality

if you believe in metaphysics, then yes, you can claim they are objective. I don't by metaphysics. I can't imagine how you would take any other position for objective morality though

@M'beke no, ig vc

oooh

sure, they can be flexible if you believe in an objective moral system

listen to Jay Dyer 🤷

a religion debate

can someone key me in pls

again, i know you're probably interested

but I'

I'm not about to explain it

just a tldr

for the 4th time today

there is no tldr

it's a system

fml

I am too tired now..

ill be back in however many minutes when ive read through

if you're tlaking to me, then the last time I explained it was a long time ago

White pill one of by bros from school has a sweet girl and a kid now FeelsGoodMan he's 24

like hours ago

I've been on here for hours now

lol

I know his argumentation epic style, but it is just an extension from ignorance of infinites which would assume logic is only a tool to ignorance so we must extend beyond the material world into metaphysics

24 with a kid and look at me <:impotentrage:552803856535257090>