so what makes it philosophical

so if there is no argument there is no philosophy?

^

so if there is no argument there is no philosophy?

what you claim is absurd and im done trying to understand your twisted form of philosophy

what you claim is not what the academic community considers philosophy

Philosophy (from Greek φιλοσοφία, philosophia, literally "love of wisdom")[1][2][3][4] is the study of general and fundamental questions

first sentence bud

not any body of knowledge

its the the study of questions about those bodies

done trying to show you that youre wrong lmao

i think some of them actually believe there is a physical dome

@Fran if you scroll down into the actual categories on that page not just the short version at the top of categories, youll see that its "pilosophy of science" not actual science. nice job disproving yourself. bye

hes saying that science is part of philosophy@Gwen

@Derek Nelson all you do is send graphics and videos, do you have math to back up any of these, or do you just think that images and drawings disprove a globe

put observation is fallible, any scientist who studies large scale objects like planets, stars or the universe knows this

stars twinkle, but only to us, because of the atmosphere, flawing that observation

youre just proving my point lmao

i do

math

just because it isnt visible doesnt mean it isnt valid

some one has never actually spent time in a real scientific community

love that vid @Drewski4343 , so pretty

nope, thats not how they operate, thats just how you want them to operate so that you can say they are wrong

things are constantly disproved and proved in science, especially in post doc research

so what causes "gravity" to you?

mass bending space time and affecting the things around it, one of the four fundamental forces

and we can see it in every star, galaxy and planet

operates exactly how the mathematical proof shows

i can directly observe and measure, drop a pencil, watch a planet circle a distant star, calculate masses, enter into the gravitational formula and see if the times match up for both]

yea by seeing it and following its movement in the night sky

with a light margin of error because of atmospheric lensing and turbulence

im not

its not a belief lmao

wait i wanna ask a question seriously derek

like light hearted debate and all aside

well theory doesnt mean the same thing in the scientific regard

theory has a higher certainty than a law, it is the highest honor a scientific proof can achieve because of how often it can be tested and proved accurately

any ways that all aside

legitimately, what would convince you that we live on a globe, if anything

the scientific method is not the only way to make scientific proofs or discoveries, but my question

what would make you think that it isnt is what im asking

ill take that as a nothing then

for me, its real scientific evidence, and a working accurate model

if nothing would make you not think the earth is flat, then they are beliefs and it is useless beyond anything else to try and disprove you

again

if nothing would make you not think the earth is flat, then they are beliefs and it is useless beyond anything else to try and disprove you

gravity is a force and therefore it can contain things, not really a belief for of a fact

just like how magnetism can hold things in place

its too large, you need to observe it by looking at planets

gravity scales with mass

just because it cant be reproduced on earth in a lab, doesnt disprove it lmao, you have to observe it in larger natural scales

again all this shows is that you have never been around real scientists

if nothing would make you not think the earth is flat, then they are beliefs and it is useless beyond anything else to try and disprove you

later bud

woaahh disrespecting a dead man

i bet you think tesla was a genius

ohhh boy ahahahah

thats a laugh

wait wait do you believe evolution isnt real too??

oh boy

evolution?

wait are you talkin about evolution

canaries on the Galapagos islands is another one

how are they not lmao

what do you mean which version

the one that states homo sapien are primate derivitave

well it probably started on earth from some sort of bacteria or some bacterial chemicals on a meteorite on primordial earth

that is something we cant prove is where it comes from but no one says evolution is the origin of life

yea

no i say thats not provable

i think that thats probably the case

im not going to waste an hour on some dude grilling a computer scientist

i dont know much ab panspermia

did you just link "The Pascal Lectures on Christianity and the University" into a scientific discussion

again , im not here to talk ab the origin of life, im talking about evolutiion

not necessarily

cringe

^

c r i n g e

there are mathematical ways to explain the genetics of evolution, but the rest is behavioral soooo yea no math@Derek Nelson

oh boy scientism brought up

bye bye

in physics yes,@Derek Nelson not in behavioral biology

anyways byebye

nope

keep tellin yaself that bub

"short" lmao imma college student i dont have 2 and a half hours for your idiocracy