@Flat Earth PhD I'm a little late, but here's a good example of exposure. In this video, the exposure has been set for lower lighting conditions and allows us to see the stars in the background. If you take a look at the first 3 seconds of the video, though, that exposure completely blows out the details on the arm of the satellite on the right of the screen to the point of just being pure white. Those are the kind of lighting extremes you get with different exposure rates (depending on your camera). https://youtu.be/6jq8-UjhHh4
Mainstream science operates by scientific consensus. Where they merely all agree with eachother theories are real. Excusing themselves from proving it. Religions do the same thing.
i can directly observe and measure, drop a pencil, watch a planet circle a distant star, calculate masses, enter into the gravitational formula and see if the times match up for both]
If you could prove something by the scientific method, you would. Since you can’t, you have to opt for a different method that’s entirely theory, that you treat as fact. You’re a religious zealot in that regard. (Because you can’t prove it.)
theory has a higher certainty than a law, it is the highest honor a scientific proof can achieve because of how often it can be tested and proved accurately
