^^

Once the Boomers die off the progress is on. They're dead weight

The fuck?

Ah. The ChRiStIaNiTy Is JuDaIsM argument

By that logic Western civilization has been judaic since the 330s AD

@Deleted User Aen said it

Molymeme is a joke. Hes a libertarian who gestures towards an empty racial solidarity, and hes late to the party. That weepy trip to Poland was cringe

^

The trends

100%

@themiddleman🐸 Yep. "The browns arent liberal enough" basically.

@Deleted User Your username triggered the fuck out of me for a sec 😂

Liberalism was a mistake

That goes for the conservative, market liberalism too

Hottest woman I've ever seen in person was Dutch

^

@themiddleman🐸 I remember that. That whole crowd is useless. You can't be a nationalist and peddle the hyperindividualist right-liberal shit they do.

Can you be a thot and not titty stream?

Idk I dont follow any of these people. Cultured Thug and Striker are the only political people I watch consistently. The rest is all history, geopolitics, or random shit

Fucking New Zealand

If the 19th was repealed I would not be upset

About 80% of women would be. Then youd have legions of white knights, so itll never happen

That's what I say. But you've gotta pick your battles and that's way down the line. We've gotta get men on board with the Third Position before anything

We need all men, bc white men are all over the place

Not in relation to the Republican party, which is why we need a Third Position

If you're thinking in terms of GOP/Democrat you're fucking up bc you're talking in terms of two brands of liberalism. Economic for one, social for the other

You can absolutely have a Third Party if you focus on Congress and the states and have a broadly appealing message. Astoundingly, the US has zero third parties doing that rn. They're all niche parties. Veritable vanity projects

And blow all their budgets on high profile presidential races

I dont see the GOP as remotely Third Position. It's an option Americans haven't even had

@Nerthulas Nah. History and current factors say otherwise. If this was 1960, where 99% of voters were either Dem or Rep I'd agree. But we're living in times that mirror the 1850s, when the GOP and Know Nothings rose from the ashes of the Whigs and the Democratic Party split into regional factions

We'll probably always be a Two Party system but what those two parties are isnt set in stone

I'm not calling for 30 parties in Congress. I'm calling for a new Party for the right

Of course. But the Third Position is organic. Any American version will conform to American culture. Obviously there will be deep opposition but power is the main thing. And a movement won't focus merely on electoral success in any event

Libs and cons definitely need reeducation, but I'll settle for electoral domination

It'd conform with American ideology too. The federalist and national strains however, along the lines of Clay and Hamilton and Teddy Roosevelt. Not the localist/individualist Jeffersonian strain

Not too much different from the 1850s Republicans and Free Soilers either, come to think of it

Fuck the East Asians

Austria isnt a real country @Markomann

@Markomann I am proud of myself for getting the Marcomanii reference in your username though

Skinny fat?

So a basic European like body. Not ripped, not overweight

Americans do seem to be just bigger, fat or not. Idk if it's all the shit we put in our food or what

@Deleted User Yeah. We're big people for whatever reason

Curls are mandatory

35lbs for me

I used to work out a fuck ton when I did track and football but now it's just the occasional thing to stay defined. My six pack is gone, stomach is still flat though

What's your height in American?

One inch taller than me. What's your weight in American?

15 lbs heavier. You're probably not too bad then

That's pretty much how I look but with way better arms. Being a mover helps a ton in that regard

A robe?

Ah

That chair doesnt look comfortable at all

<:confusedcat:621084703482576918>

Why?

Pretty sure it is

Extremely awkward. Leg day is bad enough as it is without having a sore groin

Never tried it. Probably never will

As a former Chicago suburbanite I get the frustration but people vote, not trees and streams. If you dont win all the Chicago suburbs you're fucked if you lose Cook County. New York has a similar problem

@21ooAB That's because Philly doesnt dominate the state like Chicago dominates Illinois. Beyond Chicagoland Illinois is basically Indiana. Not a ton of people out there. Whereas PA is more evenly distributed

Not. One. Drop.

@BasedChris Mixing among swedes is fine unless they brought back and spawned with an Irishwoman

@BasedChris Agreed. If you're not Flemish you're French lol

@Brakeer V2 Lmfao I didn't kick you bro. I sent you a tongue-in-cheek reply right as your name went white. Shogun did it

Muh purity.

"Long live Israel."
Not the kind of shit I want to see floating across my notifications

By and large I think that all checks out, though I'd splice it even finer. I see a:
0.1% (ultra-rich)
0.9% (rich)
9% (never need to budget)
65-90%
45/50-65%
25-45/50%
Bottom 25%

Middle and working class can blur. You can do well by traditional manual labor or be making 35k scraping by at an office job, so I try and look at income as a proxy. The real fun begins when that quarter of the population between 65 band 90 (like myself) start to feel that the system is bullshit. Get a few 1% and 9% defectors and you get real change

Depends. You can get an alliance of the very top and very bottom, like happened in Persia during the Mazdakite revolt or often in Rome with the Emperors and the People against the Senatorial class. But just as often it's a slow rot, where people accept policies that at first only effect the underclass but gradually move up the food chain until eventually people find themselves in positions that they think they're better than. When that happens, what form the reaction takes depends on whether the Left or the Right seizes the narrative first.

And I'm too much of a republican to ever accept a monarchy or inherited aristocracy but at least with that there wouldn't be any pretense of "meritocracy," and people would at least *pretend* to care about more than quarterly earnings and hedonistic consumption.

True. No one has more class consciousness than the wealthy. I agree with the corporatist cooperative model but that requires keeping the potential plutocrats on a much shorter leash than anyone else, because (as the liberalization of the 70s-90s showed) they cause by far the most destruction when broken loose from the bonds of the nation.

This was the cuckservatives biggest mistake. Thinking that you could ever have a stable and cohesive society while forcefully pushing a globalist, individualistic, "disruptive" economic force. It's a short and straight line between "fuck society it's my money" and "fuck society I'll identify as/marry who/do whatever I please."

^^^

*structure*
That's being generous