Message from @「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0
Discord ID: 658943699312443392
I'm taking a shower
How much do you engage with the moralistic fallacy as well?
@Tbg1203 Reductio is
It is the case that most people want to have children
However, there's no should involved... if someone wants to have kids or not, there's no way that leaps you to one should call being outside the norm is a mental illness
It's an is/ought gap
It is a desire for people to have children
However, you can't get to a premise like "You should have children"
And if you bite the bullet on all desires then yeah.. you wind up biting the bullet on things like rape.
It is a desire for some % of people to rape others
That's about the whole point of this conversation... is that you can't get a "should" from a description
Or a prescription from a description
I think you were asking a question about it...
I may have missed your exact wordage
Which is why I like text
It sounded like you were skeptical to something about the normalcy of having children or the morality of it
I was curious on the naturalistic fallacy
Oh yeah... the naturalistic fallacy and the is/ought gap are basically one and the same
You can't get from "It is good to live" to "You ought to live" through reason alone
sure
anti-natalism gang <:PEPELAUGH:643817011117424708>
@muhahahahe you online?
mmh
what up?
The death grip
Lol
Economy of scale
@Tbg1203 Unironically, it's cheaper more efficient to have homeless in places where it's easier to get goods to them
Urban areas
Yeah
I don't have the exact reasoning, but this is one possible reason
Communist boi has down stats on this
It's cheaper to have them closer to the services
What's the relevance of 125?
66 is the delorian
Or 68 mph
I don't even know where these memes went
Yeah, this is ... obvious / basic economics of comparative advantage