Snack®
Discord ID: 213500306783338496
123 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next
Hello
@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 There is no evidence that 9/11 and every pacer search costs money. The "sealed indictments" you're referring to don't exist.
I've not been actively looking. No reason to spend money looking for something that there is no evidence of.
ruff
@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 I don't know that they aren't there. I just know that there is no actual evidence that they are there.
How do you know that unicorns don't exist?
How do you know?
So you don't know. Exactly. But does that mean you have any reason to believe that unicorns actually exist?
Do you have any evidence that this is true?
How confident are you that this is going to happen?
Imagine instead of indictments we were talking about unicorns still. Imagine if every time I checked for the existence of unicorns it cost me 20 cent. How many times would I have to check for the existence of unicorns before you would believe that the unicorns, for which there is no evidence that they actually exist, were not real?
What direction would that be?
I've already shown you that the number of "sealed" indictments that were claimed to have existed didn't actually exist.
Again, the 2009 report they are referring to doesn't say what they think it says if they are still using the source I think they are using.
But the link is broken.
So the report they are using to say what is "normal" is where they go wrong.
I believe it is this http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/sealed-cases.pdf
Seems right.
No way of knowing, probably much less than they claim, like I showed before. Indictments are regularly unsealed.
Also they were scanning for all sealed indictments and not criminal indictments.
https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/sealed-indictments-qanon-conspiracy/ This goes into detail
@Dobermann Don't act like your're not impressed.
Thoughts on that qanon cop getting demoted?
@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 Don't think he got suspended, just removed from the SWAT team
@9 freaky dykes That's not nice
@9 freaky dykes I wish you wouldn't say mean things like that
@Czepa I was having issues with my mic
After a windows update.
I think I've fixed it
VACCINATE YO KIDS
```Naturopaths claim that they practice based on scientific principles. Yet examinations of naturopathic literature, practices and statements suggest a more ambivalent attitude. NDhealthfacts.org neatly illustrates the problem with naturopathy itself: Open antagonism to science-based medicine, and the risk of harm from “integrating” these practices into the practice of medicine. Unfortunately, the trend towards “integrating” naturopathy into medicine is both real and frightening. Because good medicine isn’t based on invented facts and pre-scientific beliefs – it must be grounded in science. And naturopathy, despite the claims, is anything but scientific.
```
5G is safe. Debate me.
I'd love to debate the Flat Earth.
Who is doing it?
@brother mutton Dunno what that is.
@FTFE Ayyy. I'm a fan.
@rivenator12113 Citation needed
@rivenator12113 Argentina is close to Antarctica?
@rivenator12113 Citation needed
@rivenator12113 There are plenty of places closer.
@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 What you are doing is called false equivocation. Very dishonest.
The Earth is round...
Sorry boys.
@rivenator12113 "We came from monkeys"...
Neat.
@rivenator12113 Evolution is a little more complex than "We came from monkeys".
@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 I can't talk in the Debate Text Chat.
But when you accused the definitions of being "Circular reasoning" you were incorrect on multiple fronts, you were using a false equivalency and not using the term "Circular reasoning" correctly.
Lol.
@zep tepi Flat Earthers can't handle that.
@rivenator12113 `You can't stretch with a sphere to the heavens` What does this mean?
@rivenator12113 I'm familiar with the words. I just don't know what you mean when you are using these words.
@FTFE Debunking the Flerthers. Swish.
@Seeker of Truth Neat.
@Seeker of Truth Not sure what you think that proves. That wasn't a "crisis actor". That's Kristen Bell. She was in a movie.
@Phantorang But you're supposed to trust your eyes. Except when trusting your eyes leads to observations that contradict the flat earth.
@Phantorang Of course not.
Because the Earth is round.
@zep tepi Pretty much.
The earth is an oblate spheroid.
@Rigg5 Stop it. Get some help.
@Death9Reaper What do you mean, `died protecting the American people`?
@Death9Reaper His speech was about communism.
@Rigg5 K. Ever hear a conspiracy you didn't believe in?
@Death9Reaper What do you think he was talking about?
@Rigg5 You can easily tell that they aren't the same people.
@Death9Reaper And how could you confirm this?
@Death9Reaper
Sure
@The Gwench How much you wanna bet Trudeau never said that?
@Rigg5 Even if he did have plastic surgery, how does that make him JFK?
@Rigg5 Part of the ear is similar, if you ignore the rest of the ear that isn't...
So, if everything has been changed, how do you know Carter is JFK?
Am I not going to get unmuted?
How have I attacked you?
I've lowered my microphone volume.
I just don't like people dancing around the facts.
A simple yes or no question can be answered simply with a yes or no.
I'm always respectful.
I like to keep things on topic.
@RidleyChozo Still can't post images.
Yeah, check my roles.
@RidleyChozo That last one is highly disingenuous. There's nothing above us blocking the view of the sun on the flat earth model.
I still can't post images.
@RidleyChozo That's clearly photoshopped. Come on.
I can't post images.
The left part is very obviously photoshopped.
They used the smudge tool.
That's why you can't see the black lines anymore.
@^Kevin^ I think you're stuck unable to have an actual debate with me and instead insist on strawmanning me.
]
Nope.
Maybe becasue I'm lead?
123 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next