@^Kevin^ I would love to debate you.

There's something you guys should know about me. I'm the smartest person on Earth.

@^Kevin^ So it should be easy to debate me.

@RidleyChozo Nope.

@^Kevin^ There are no measurements that demonstrate that the Earth is flat because the Earth is round.

Now I can post pictures.

@RidleyChozo

That's what I wanted to show you

🖐

@^Kevin^ `Antikythera mechanism this mechanism worked on flat earth, they messed with it and broke it to try to promote the globe.` *[citation needed]*

@RidleyChozo Shit is out of focus.

```If the object is distant enough, its angular size approaches zero, and the object appears to shrink to a point. Angular resolution is the smallest angular size that is still recognizable by an optical system.

The angular resolution of a human eye is about one arcminute or about 0.017°. If an object has the angular resolution smaller than one arcminute, our eye would not be able to recognize the object.

To increase the object’s angular size, we have to approach the object. Or we can use an optical aid, like a telescope or a binocular. These will improve angular size, and objects with smaller angular size will be easier to discern.

A receding object has a continuously diminishing angular size. If its angular size goes below the limit of our angular resolution, the object will no longer be recognizable. If there’s no barrier, the object would appear whole the entire time until its angular size is too small for us to recognize. In this case, we say the object disappears because of perspective.

In other cases, a receding object appears whole at first, then at some point, a portion of it becomes unseen, and as it goes farther, more of it becomes unseen, all while leaving the rest of the object visible. Such cases are not the result of perspective. The angular size of the object is still higher than our angular resolution. The object gradually becomes unseen because of obstruction from another object, like the curvature of the Earth.

```

@RidleyChozo Yes.

Clearly.

@RidleyChozo Better focused than the other objects for sure. How do you know they were taken with the same telescope?

The Earth is an oblate spheroid.

I'm starting to think maybe the moon landings actually did happen.

Well, I always knew that all the evidence pointed to the moon landings being real, but I guess I just thought that the evidence didn't matter for a while...

Trolling = Disagreeing?

That's what you seem to be inferring.

@🎃Oakheart🎃 I do not have an attitude.

@Flat Earth PhD That's been debunked multiple times. Bart Sibrel lies blatantly about a lot of things.